In response to:

Museum Visit Reveals a lot of Uncertainties Within Darwinism

John5840 Wrote: Jun 27, 2012 2:48 PM
CAN you name a respected scientist who claims that the vestigial bones in whales are there to support reproductive organs and were not initially part of a leg structure. ANd can you explain the other vestigial factors, such as a diaphragm (useless in whales) muscles to move the ear (but there is no ear) and body hair on embryos, but essentially none on whales after birth.

I went to two New York City churches on the last Sunday morning of May: First a Christian one, then the American Museum of Natural History, a towering steeple within the Church of Darwin.

My first stopping point: The Spitzer Hall of Human Origins on the lower level, a dark and crowded chapel with hairy figures created to show man's purported hominid ancestry over several million years. Some parents were catechizing their young children: "Look, those are our relatives." (As I listened, one unbelieving girl, staring at the private parts of the hirsute mannequins, laughed, "We didn't come from them."...