In response to:

It's Come to This: Sandra Fluke Nominated for Person of the Year

John5507 Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 12:06 AM
oh katie, oxy limbaugh can't be person(s) of the year every year and the sainted Mr. Reagan is dead. maybe one of your nutball idols like bachmann or cUlter.
Allen331 Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 1:03 AM
You ain't too bright, so I'll help you out.

Rush never was, Reagan already was, and maybe Michele Bachman & Ann Coulter should be, since, if a single insult is all the criteria Time needs to nominate a woman.
To wit: honorable women like Ann & Michele receive torrents of abuse, while the shoehorn Fluke got only one insult, (and an accurate one since she burns thru $4,285 a year in prophylactics).

Not to worry; Time already put the worst pictures available of Ann & Michele on their cover. Time will make sure Fluke is as radiant as possible – though it will take serious patience.

Apparently in the year 2012 all you have to do to become nominated as TIME's Person of Year is throw away your dignity and beg your neighbors in front of Congress to pay for your sex life as a 30-year-old adult child. TIME asks readers, should Sandra Fluke be chosen as Person of the Year? Definitely? No way? Below is TIME's description:

As always, TIME's editors will choose the Person of the Year, but that doesn't mean readers shouldn't have their say. Cast your vote for the person you think most influenced the news this year...