Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Christmas in an Anti-Christian Age

John1921 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 3:04 PM
I don't have time to read every coment. Did anybody remind Pat to mention that the very terms 'Anno Domini' and 'Before Christ' are being abolished from books and museum exhibits? And what, pray tell, would this censorship have to do with "science"? This is a direct attack on Western/European/Christian civilization itself, not some quarrel over dogma.
In response to:

Christmas in an Anti-Christian Age

John1921 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 2:51 PM
I would think one thing 'paleoconservatives' ought to agree on would be that, all things being equal, the right thing to do would be very close to what the Founding Fathers did. In 1787, blasphemy and sodomy were Common Law crimes, punishable by death. Without much in the way of historical evidence to guide them, they somehow understood that religious belief was the foundation of every society. And they were not slow to act to prevent any attack on their Christian religion. We practice toleration, and we are surrendering to the infidels. Infidels always prove to be bad -- you can look it up.
In response to:

God With Us

John1921 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 2:41 PM
6,000 years, of course....
In response to:

God With Us

John1921 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 2:41 PM
Recorded humnan history goes back over 6,00 years, To consider normal life to be the way things have been for the last 100 years is beyond idiocy. Forever before the discovery of penicillin just before WW II (not nearly 100 years ago), childhood mortality was always high. With O'bwana-Care set to destroy the last remaining world-class medical research-and-development system, childhood looks to become dangerous again soon.
In response to:

Guns Save Lives

John1921 Wrote: Dec 23, 2012 2:39 PM
Mr Root makes some legitimate points, but facts don't matter here. The Tree of Liberty is dessicated. It's time for "the last arguamnt of Patriots" to be unholstered. BTW, his point about the German Jews being disarmed is quite interesting. In America what do you guess the percentage of Jewish-Americans supporting gun-control/confiscation would be? Of course, they are supporting the elimination of white peoples' 2nd Amendment rights here. The point is, that in Weimar Germany, just as in America today, Jews are essentially the Left (providing leadership, funding, and much of the membership), and the Left is anti-American, just as it was anti-German in the 30s. Voting against people who aim to destroy you is not really that difficult.
In response to:

Guns Save Lives

John1921 Wrote: Dec 23, 2012 2:31 PM
The Dems rely just as heavily on racism for their election strategy. Compare the percentage of the white vote the GOP gets with the percentage of the black vote that goes to the Dems for the comparison of who's more racist. Of course, the Dems do get the votes of non-American whites, sexual perverts, criminals, and the insane (all core parts of the Dem constituency), so it's not directly comparable.
In response to:

Guns Save Lives

John1921 Wrote: Dec 23, 2012 2:26 PM
I'll concede one way the Nazis and the GOP were similar, and one error in your little jingle. The Nazis did not "come for me" (if 'me' is German) because the Nazis were National Socialists. They were pro-German. Just as the GOP is pro-American. Of course, the ones who wanted to come after Germans, and destroy their culture, religion, and general way-of-life, were the Leftists. Just as Leftists in America work day and night to destroy America's religion, culture and society (ACLU anybody?). In 1933, the German people faced a choice between cultural/religious suicide with the Left, or the Nazis, who were pro-German, with some less-than-desirable aspects to their agenda. Putting myself in their shoes, doesn't sound like a tough choice.
Leftists can, and do, offer non-whites affirmative action, contract set-asides, racial-norming on qualification tests, hate-crime laws that make whites guilty of wrongful thought, and an Attorney General who practices race-based enforcement of Federal laws for "his people". All animal societies are dominance hierarchies. If you went to school before the 60s you might recall the 'pecking order'. In a nutshell, this means that in any society, either non-whites will be beaten on the street by whites, or whites wil be beaten on the streets by non-whites. These are the only two alternatives -- no ties. Drudge is doing a good job of highlighting news stories pointing out who's getting the beat-downs lately.
History demonstrates that defeating Leftists is useless. We defeated Hillarycare in 94, and less than 20 years later, it's the law. Leftists have to be treated like a deadly poisonous snake you spot slithering under the fridge. Constant vigilance isn't the answer; you hunt down the snake and kill it. That is what was meant by the slogans about freedom not being free. When someone tries to steal your freedom, you don't try to win an election; you kill them. See, Patrick Henry for the eloquent explanation.
Sounds like the problem is that Americans allowed Jews to immigrate to the US. Rather than a scintilla of gratitude, they immediately begin demanding that Americans/Christians change their entire way of life. Reminds me of Weimar Germany, when Jews (1% of the population) controlled 26% of the economy. We'll be seeing if Santayana was right soon enough
Actually, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment specifically empowers any State to establish a State religion, and forbids Congress to make any law which would interfere with it. If America isn't a stupid country, it is certainly the most ignorant of its own history of any that ever existed. My recommendation is simply that any person objecting to any mention of God anywhere must be identified in press coverage, along with address and telephone number. In the America that the Founding Fathers founded, blasphemy was a common-law crime, punishable by death. Anybody have a clue as to what the FFs would do?
Previous 11 - 20 Next