In response to:

Women Serving in Combat Positions Is a Batty Idea

JOHN1464 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 7:05 AM
Isreal tried putting women in front line combat positions. What they found out was that in mixed gender unit when a woman was badly wounded the men became so demoralized that they were no longer able to be a cohesive fighting unit. That is why they no longer have mixed gender combat units. How many of our brave soldiers have to die for being stylish as Clint Eastwood said in the movie Magnum Force.
annfan_777 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 9:33 AM
Homosexuals in the military, another stupid liberal social experiment, is also demoralizing to the troops.
RamonAdams Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 7:52 AM
It's my understanding that Russia & Israel both discovered that men fought after they otherwise would have surrendered when there were women in the unit, presumably because the women needed to not become prisoners.
Men on the other side fought after they should have surrendered because they didn't want to surrender to women.

Last Thursday Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and other U.S. military leaders lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. I, for one, think this is a great idea and have a few modest proposals, if the brass inside the beltway is open to suggestions, on how they should deploy the dames (and whom they should deploy).

First off, if you truly want to eviscerate the enemy—namely Muslims—then I propose sending the most nerve grating and foul women Hollywood has to offer straight into hot zones as our forward armies. I’m a thinkin’ starting off with Roseanne Barr, Joy...