In response to:

The Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Work Then and It Won’t Work Now

JOHN1464 Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 6:37 AM
Feinsteins's bill to ban semi auto rifles, shotguns and handguns is not about stopping the killing of innocent children. If it were she would have allready done something about the dozens of kids that die daily on the streets of our inner cities. The progressives want to deny us the tools in which to fight tyranny. That is why these firearms scare them so much.
Seawolf Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 8:02 AM
I agree that the reason they want to disarm us eventually is that they know this nation is on it's way to anarchy because of them and like every despot in history, they cannot have an armed populace. I see people like bloomberg, schumer and feinstein in the same light as soros who sent his fellow Jews to die in the holocaust, what drives people like that to do such a despicible thing is beyond me, but they must be confronted IMO or it could happen here. If obama could sponser and fight for a bill in Ill that would allow a child that survived it's own murder in an abortion to be thrown into the medical waste bin to die alone, he is capable of anything..this man is pure evil.

Senator Dianne Feinstein is queuing up come January 2013 to retable—yet again—an Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) in order to “severely mitigate the possibilities of another Sandy Hook atrocity.” Great idea, Dianne, as the first AWB that Clinton signed into law worked wonders in schools from 1994-2004. It was awesome. It panned out wonderfully aside from the following:

  • November 7, 1994: Wickliffe, Ohio: (Wickliffe Middle School shooting) Keith Ledeger, 37, a former student at the school, shot and killed custodian Pete Christopher and wounded four other adults.
  • January 12, 1995: Seattle, Washington: A...