Previous 11 - 20 Next
Because dhimmis are not allowed to strike back.
"Even After Deadly Attack, U.S. Kowtows to Islam" What do you expect with our Dhimmi-in-Chief?
In response to:

Libya Commemorates 9/11

John1324 Wrote: Sep 13, 2012 5:30 PM
A de facto state of war exists between the USA and Egypt, Libya, and Yemen. What will our Dhimmi-in-Chief do about it?
I agree with the rest of your statement but not the first sentence: "I have read the Second Ammendment numerous times and no where did I find the words if, or, with a permit, no full automatics." The argument the something not being mentioned in the Constitution not being allowed is valid for restraining Government, since that is the purpose of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but it is an invalid argument for limiting the rights of "We the people...". Just to show you how silly your argument is... You can't have a car, pasteurized milk, an airplane or anything else not mentioned in the Constitution or added by Amendment since 1789.
At Lexington and Concord muskets were assault weapons and every farmer and most of the city folk had one.
The gun isn't the problem. You are just as dead with a knife, bare hands, wrench, lead pipe, baseball bat, etc.
In response to:

Pounding the Table about Abortion

John1324 Wrote: Sep 05, 2012 2:48 PM
I'll go along with a rape exception for abortion when we do a DNA test and execute the rapist first.
We need a tax on the hot air of politicians who believe in taxation without representation.
If you don't have debt under control, how can you retire in the lifestyle that you want to? Do you want to travel? How can you do that if you have no spare money because you are still paying off debts? Do you want to be able to be generous to charities or you grandchildren? How can you do that if you are still paying off debts?
In response to:

Republicans Can’t Duck Abortion Issue

John1324 Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 5:58 PM
Article 3 Section 3 of the Constitution says you can't punish the children of a person convicted of treason (other than executing the parent), so how can we make an exception for banning abortion in cases of rape an incest when we don't execute people for rape and incest?
I suspect he started to say "legitimate rape" in the context of a rape exception for abortion and not allowing an exception for abortion in cases of rape. And the rest of the statement shows he agrees with me that it makes no sense to execute the baby if you aren't going to execute the rapist! So, claiming rape should not be a legitimate reason for an abortion. I think we should have held Obama to the same standard being applied to Akin. Candidate Obama claimed our military "air raided villages and killed civilians". That qualifies as treason! Akin's misstatements pale in comparison!
Previous 11 - 20 Next