The impetus for intelligence and the qualifying factor for the dissemination of intelligence information was, and probably still is, the ubiquitous "need to know." Exactly WHO determines one's "need to know" may depend on the amount of innate intelligence or intellectual curiosity a person has regarding that need. Perhaps the president considers that he does not have the need to know. On the basis of prioritization, it has to be assumed that, if some inferior in the chain of command should determine that he had a particular need to know something, he would get the message.

What Obama needs is a king's ransom.

What is it about failure and discontent on the part of people in the private sector which causes them to go into government to solve those problems. Satisfaction of needs and greed by corruption and taxpayer debt? Boy, are they in for a surprise and a rude awakening.

He DID build the debt and we are going to have far less of that.

He built, and he can take credit for the size of government of which he is in charge. When the American people dismantle it on the first Tuesday in November, they will acknowledge that they didn't build it either, but they have the power to take it apart.

And, since all of this is true, why hasn't somebody done something about it? Because he would be called a racist? An extremist? A terrorist? Mentally deranged? ...... A Conservative. Thank God everybody has the patience to wait for the election, the result of which resolves all these issues by giving a mandate to the winner to forget about the oath that swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States (however you choose to interpret that). There is a lot at stake. The real question is, what do we do if the people vote for more of the same for the next four years? Can the country survive?

What is utterly appalling is that the American people bought this hook, line and sinker. Any fisherman will tell you that is the sinker that controls everything else. Hopefully, the hook is buried in the mud and the would-be suckers that would take the bait won't be able to find it. It was obvious in 2008 to anyone with open ears and eyes what was about to happen. The surprise was that things went so far South as quickly as they did and the inept response which was probably hampered more greatly by the end of the presidential term and the election. If it can not be fixed, perhaps then you throw it out. But when workers unite instead of working, you know that somebody is up to no good.

People have the freedom to be and do, sexually and privately, what they want. Public expressions of support for this concept hardly seem relevant, much less appropriate. Whatever benefits are forthcoming from them are not based on human equality, rather minority special-interest distinction accorded by pandering political interests. It makes no sense and is more hype than substance.

Then what happened? Well, without double agents, the ignorance of the feds would be intolerable. So, two-faced though it is, for the benefit of the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat, guaranteed to keep you in suspense, there is nothing quite like intellectual vulnerability to ideas that represent some interpretation of freedom of choice. What laws are violated here?

So that explains the guarded secrets of his personal documentation. There's nothing there.

If only government would stay out of business.