1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Great Obama Blunder

Joey_D Wrote: May 30, 2012 5:44 PM
"At no extra charge" is more like it. It will definitely be a much greater cost to the insurance companies. No free lunch.
"...rarely self-indulgent"?!? Sorry, Mr. Brooks. Obama is nothing if not self-indulgent. Easily the most arrogant, narcissistic, self-obsessed figure in American history.
In response to:

'Money Primary' Pushes Obama to the Left

Joey_D Wrote: May 11, 2012 9:35 AM
I don't believe Biden's comments were a gaffe. I believe it was all planned out and ready to go. Perhaps Biden let it fly a bit early, but it was planned for him to say what he said. How else to you explain the very quick media response of the Romney "bullying" story? The Administration had three of its members come out in support of gay marriage in a matter of days, then the media had a ready-made story on deck to make Romney look anti-gay. How convenient. Is there any doubt that the MSM is in bed with the Obama camp? They don't just support him. I believe they're on the payroll.
Let's hope that we Americans are as fed up with our own over-spending as we are with Europe's and carry that sentiment to the polls in November.
I, for one, am thoroughly enjoying watching this blow up in Warren's face and her pathetic, laughable attempts to justify her past actions. "...in the hopes that it might mean that I would be invited to a luncheon, a group something that might happen with people who are like I am." HAHA. It'd be sad if she wasn't so deserving of humiliation and rebuke.
In response to:

How Bill Gates Rips Off Babies

Joey_D Wrote: May 07, 2012 9:11 AM
Gates and Buffett are crony capitalists. They preach about the rich needing to pay more taxes, when they will most likely get their pals in Washington to exempt them from having to pay more. They project an image of being "compassionate billionaires," which may score them some points with the Occupy crowd (a ringing endorsement, to be sure), but they are exactly the kind of billionaire that makes other billionaires look bad. Self-absorbed, politically-connected, and extremely hypocritical.
Sounds like Morgan really held Goldberg's feet to fire. Amirite, gang? I'm sure his three regular viewers were delighted. Seriously, Piers Morgan is a complete joke. He could probably host orgies on his show and no one would ever know the difference.
"The Life of Julia" is one of the most condescending, creepiest things I've ever seen. Has anyone on the Left dared to come out in defense of this propaganda piece?
Isn't saying that all Indians "have high cheekbones" a racist statement? Isn't the use of the term "Indian" to describe Native Americans highly politically incorrect? Warren made two huge blunders in a single statement, yet where are the outcries of racism and bigotry? You know if Scott Brown said either of those two things the Left would be out in the streets with torches and pitchforks calling for his head. Of course, I'm obviously a sexist for even pointing out such a thing, right?
"It was intended to create a financial incentive for companies to provide insurance." I have to slightly disagree with this statement. That was the mandate's ostensible purpose. If they really wanted to create a punitive effect for not providing health insurance, then the fine would be much larger. This is really intended for employers to opt out of providing insurance so the government can come in and save the day. I heard about this several months ago and we should be just as mad about it as we are about the individual mandate. This law's ultimate goal is to convert to a government-run healthcare system. It can achieve its goal many different ways. That is why the entire thing must go. Partial repeal is not good enough.
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, June 03 | 12:35 PM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 12:35 PM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 12:35 PM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 12:35 PM ET