In response to:

NRA’s Wayne LaPierre Slams Obama’s Reference to ‘Absolutism’

Joesolis Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 4:34 PM
What do these shooters have in common? Ft Hood ~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat Tucson, AZ - Gabby Giffords Shooter ~~~ Known to be a Bush hater. Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal. Connecticut School Shooter- ~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians, Answer: ALL of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats." Would our Liberal Friends please explain this?
shutefght Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 5:07 PM
No such thing as "liberal friends". They are incapable. Liberals are brainwashed, baby killing, servile sycophants serving up heaping help fulls of pure evil. Pure scum.
AmyDB Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 4:36 PM
All but one were also "gun free zones"
Ken6226 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 4:57 PM
I still say if gun control is such a good idea, then Obama should declare the White House a gun-free zone.

President Obama’s inaugural address was arguably one of the most liberal speeches he’s ever delivered—but one line in particular drew the ire of NRA’s Wayne LaPierre:  “We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate.”

Speaking at the 56th annual Weatherby Foundation International Hunting and Conservation Award dinner in Reno, Nev., LaPierre said, “Obama wants to turn the idea of “absolutism” into another dirty word, just another word for extremism. He wants you to accept the idea of “principles” as he sees fit to define them. It’s a way of...