But the non-believers can't dispute that nature itself is "prejudiced" against homosexuality, and has been since the dawn of time. ------------------------------------------------ Nope. But occasionally a society will go on a rampage.. but that isn't the world and everywhere, and all the time. Sometimes.. yes. In Rome in 400 AD.. not at all. Please yourself as I will, but protect the kids from nauseating propaganda and let them decide as they want.

97% of the people in the world have hormones that push them around daily and they want a woman.. now. 3% of the people in the world have hormones that push them around and they want a member of their own sex.. now. Fine. And if it doesn't make any difference, we can leave gays out of television 97% of the time, and create television that more nearly reflects real society.. and that is gooooood stuff for me. But it does make a difference. It does, and the gays are making a pretty big fuss on the issue. Now if it was me watching the television, big deal.. I can sit still for 20 minutes and then I have to do something worth while. But here is the reason what I do and see, doesn't count. Kids watch the television, the excellent propaganda, and wonder. It isn't a case of them making up their own mind.. that whole area is dark and mysterious. And for kids.. it is very important that they arrive with a good understanding of the issue. SOO.. lets protect the kids. 97% hetro.. 3% homo, and in fact, lets move the sexual play TV programs to prime time sos the parents have a chance to guide and protect.

A really good journalism piece on this issue. A few things to add: The Catholic Church and Immigration Reform By Stephanie Block http://www.catholicmediacoalition.org/church_immigration_reform.htm Catholic Charities give hope to New Mexico’s illegal aliens http://johnpaulschmidt.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/catholic-charities-give-hope-to-new-mexicos-illegal-aliens/ Catholics, Immigration, and the Common Good http://www.cis.org/catholics-and-immigration (Fr. Dominique Peridans is an Associate Pastor at a Roman Catholic parish in Maryland) Illegal Immigration and Catholic Social Teaching By Father Thomas Berg * http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=1231 Religious conservatives make moral case for immigration reform http://www.dailynews.com/ci_22840004/religious-conservatives-make-moral-case-immigration-reform.html For Rep. Mick Mulvaney, a Republican, the appeal came a week ago from his parish priest as he was leaving Mass back home in Fort Mill, S.C. "I asked him, 'How are we doing on this?' " said the Rev. John Giuliani, a Catholic priest who said he believes the laws should extend to illegal immigrants the human dignity he says Bible demands. "I tell him, 'Be open. We have to move in a direction that's going to help the most people.' " An introduction to NAFBPO National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers http://www.nafbpo.org/ ---------------- Amnesty Fraud http://nafbpo.org/supporting_legalization_fraud.htm

latimes.com Radar shows U.S. border security gaps Vader, a system originally used to track the Taliban, finds that more immigrants elude capture at the U.S.-Mexico border than previously estimated. By Brian Bennett, Washington Bureau 5:22 PM PDT, April 3, 2013 WASHINGTON — A sophisticated airborne radar system developed to track Taliban fighters planting roadside bombs in Afghanistan has found a new use along the U.S. border with Mexico, where it has revealed gaps in security. Operated from a Predator surveillance drone, the radar system has collected evidence that Border Patrol agents apprehended fewer than half of the foreign migrants and smugglers who had illegally crossed into a 150-square-mile stretch of southern Arizona. The number of "gotaways," as the Border Patrol calls those who escape apprehension, is both more precise and higher than official estimates. ------------ These are the new drones. ---------------------------------- Hard wired by Boeing ------------ latimes.com Radar shows U.S. border security gaps Vader, a system originally used to track the Taliban, finds that more immigrants elude capture at the U.S.-Mexico border than previously estimated. http://theepitaph.com/index.php By Brian Bennett, Washington Bureau 5:22 PM PDT, April 3, 2013 The $6.7 billion project, launched in 2005 by the Bush Administration, was supposed to secure the border using "virtual fencing" and electronic surveillance. ------------------------------------------- Do a search for the multibillion dollars silliness by asking Google for electronic border fence. That little doodad cost more than the operating budget of the Border Patrol and didn't work in the end. While you are looking though... Electric fence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_fence Found on: Google In 1915, during World War I, the German occupiers of Belgium closed off the border with neutral Netherlands, using a 300 km electric fence running from Vaals to... (Worked too.)

What an article. Almost all of it is wrong, but it amazes me that anyone would put that up without doing the research. 1. They began trimming the budget provided the Immigration Service, and did that, by the way, at that point where the cold war ended, and the peace bonus hit town. (At this point, the information that would tell you more about apprehensions and such has been taken down by the Presidents men, and you really cannot see the affect of the reduction in money. But try.. http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm (Enforcement page begins on page 87, and on page 91, the statistical information begins. All of the data forward of 91 is correct.) There are a dozen more points to consider, but I don't have the room. The cost of enforcement rose beyond belief when Napelatano got the service mixed up with the electronic fence. And that requires typing space soo...

There is sort of a standard in this business. If you are bright and illegal, you are working very hard, or worked very hard, to become legal. If you are illegal and assume the United States needs you, you have not worked to become legal. The lower echelon of the illegal aliens will need a great deal more welfare than any other group. The lower echelon has welfare at this point totaling about $113 billion a year. Give them amnesty, or what the Senate Bill suggested they should have, and what they can take legally will go way up.

No. What we ..have.. is a very expensive group of people playing the nation as best they can as illegal aliens. With amnesty, the difficulties of tapping into our social welfare will be removed, and the entitlement expenditures will go way, way up. The Senate Bill changes daily, and so far, in all circumstances on the Bill, both Senator McCain and Senator Graham, as well as Rubio, have either not known how the bill works, or lied to us like rugs. I don't give a hoot which one you pick.. it is an automatic F in my class for either one. Many, many employers are using illegal aliens and I believe McCain, Graham and Rubio are working hard to protect them from legal action with the Senate Bill. I think it might work.

Officers who go into the rough neighborhoods of ANY group, face a great deal of danger. But add this: those guys are the smart criminals and some of them could frame anyone. So lets change that premise and say... officers who go into the rough neighborhoods of any group face a great deal of danger, and should have the back up of a polygraph when accusers attempt to destroy them. Put those accusers on the polygraph, and if they flunk it, provide them with consequences predicated by the seriousness of the lying. If we do not do that, we are spinning our wheels, and you can bet your everything, I would not hire or live in a black or brown community. So.. what's it gonna be?

I agree with this. And what in the world are we doing as we do it. The Parties should be behind the American People full tilt bogey. Neither one of them are, but the Republican Party should get there as fast as they can. NO to illegal aliens.. YES to American Workers. NOT Rocket science.

The Republican Party failed to win blocks of votes from the very beginning of time. The Democrats never get the very wealthy. The blocks the Republican Party wins are far richer, but that does not, nor can, compensate for the blocks the Democrats are winning. Why. If the Republican Party had the leadership that could sit down and look at our society realistically, we would win every time. We change jobs on an average of six times in our careers and I bet that goes up a lot. We need far, far, far more training than ever before. We have far more difficulties than ever before. We have very serious imbalances in Republican views, and the feeling the Republican Party will always get the little guy is very strong, and very real. This party had better move over to protecting the American People as the live their lives, and at the same time, making sure business is also protected. That is NOT hard to do either.