Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Beyond Affirmative Action

Joe_Ks Wrote: Feb 19, 2014 3:37 PM
S.17 .... Well said and attaboy. Having said that, I hate to say it, but there does seem to be an ever increasing number of whites who are intellectually inferior as well. As a mater of fact, there seems to be a growing number of white men over the age of 30, even 45, still living with Mommy. I call them "Saber Tooth Papooses" Papoose being something Mommy has to carry on her back and a Saber Tooth being to big and to dangerous to tell it to walk on it's own two feet. I think when we think of "intellectual ability" we often confuse kids who may have lower IQs with kids who just kind of grew up with no real input from Dad and sometimes mom. Growing up like a weed does tend to leave one with the apparent IQ of a rag weed. Maybe the problem is not really "IQ" as most of us think of it, but is more of "IR" problem (idiot raised)
"Last month's job report ended 2013 on a low note with just 74,000 jobs created, one of the lowest numbers in years." Yeah. And they were all snow jobs.
Think Progress Says “Progressives” ~ The thing is, whenever I think "progressives" I think "Progress toward the proverbial hell in a hand basket". I can't think of anything else "progressives" have ever accomplished ("progressive" = umbrella type colloquialism used to disquise socialism, statism, communism, fascism or any other ism that removes freedom from individuals and makes them subject to the divine right of government elitist.)
Yep, the man never does anything without a duplicitous motive.
The "ugly ratings" are the direct result of ugly policies, ugly comments, ugly view of America, ugly regard for the Constitution, ugly interpretations of the thoughts of decent Americans, ugly misuse of Biblical versus, ugly cronyism, ugly justice department laziness, ugly state department inefficiency, an ugly health care train wreck, ugly self aggrandizement, ugly pontifications and last but not least (any way, I hope I didn't leave anything out) ugly bullying of any kind of opposition, ugly use of the IRS, ugly intimidation of media, ugly intimidation of the Supreme Court, ugly vision for fundamental change, a multitude of ugly lies, ugly, deliberate use of race to divide America more than it already is, ugly attacks on producers, ugly pandering to the deliberately lazy and inefficient and at least two ugly allies in Congress (Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid)
Maybe we should go ahead and give them San Francisco and Los Angeles right now
In response to:

Victory Song For The Heroic Man

Joe_Ks Wrote: Jan 07, 2014 3:38 PM
I once heard a man say "I believe in kicking a man when he's down. If he's a good man, it makes him want to get up. If he's a bad man, it makes him want to get out." That's pretty hard core, but it used to work.
"So why, then, do they elect statists.....?" Just my personal opinion, I suppose, but I think the French may have gotten their statists the same way we got ours ... voter fraud, propaganda, lying, politicians, character assassins, thieves and corruption made to look like it was "for the children"
In response to:

Iraq Continues to Fall into Chaos

Joe_Ks Wrote: Jan 07, 2014 3:07 PM
"When the opposition boycotts the election; turnout is low and the outcome is fore-ordained has a valid exercise of democracy occurred?" The answer is NO, it hasn't. This is why Eric Holder, Barack Obama and the entire Democrat party let the "New Black Panther Party" off the hook for deliberately intimidating and threatening voters at the polls.
I thought the Democrats motto was "Vote Democrat. It's easier than working" .... do you suppose there might be a riff in the Democrat party, or are some of them just lying about their motto?
In response to:

Five Myths About Inequality

Joe_Ks Wrote: Jan 05, 2014 1:02 PM
To whatever level inequality does or does not exist is largely irrelevant any way because inequality is the political goal of liberals who have taken to wanting to be called progressives. I mean, if you have something you want to sell, you have to have a market for it. This includes ideas. If the political market of "inequality" does not actually exist, then you create the idea that it does with lies, more lies and damn lies until enough people buy into the idea to give you the power to do something about it IE: income redistribution. Not that the Democrats really care overly much about income redistribution or so-called 'poor people'. What they care about is more money and power for themselves. "Poor people" and income distribution are both just tools to accomplish the ultimate goal. This is the primary reason the Democrats refuse to take a hard stand on illegal immigration. They see 'poor people' as a renewable resource for the votes, money and power they can gain from it. They don't really give a flying flip about poor people from south of the border. What they care about is using those people, adding them to the rolls of "useful idiots' that they see any one as who subscribes to the various myths they create Liberals/democrats hyper inflate the realities with propaganda and hate speech which they constantly accuse the opposition of): A short list of liberal created myths that are useful to them for gaining money, votes and political power: racism is a white thing, no-one else has it, children must be protected from conservative ideas and values, any one not homosexual and not approving of homosexuality is a homophobic bigot, the rich are evil are the cause of most evils not only in American, but evil rich white Americans are the cause of the misery in the rest of the world as well. (unless of course they are democrats, then they just wish they were taxed more than they are while they take advantage of every possible tax break themselves and sometimes engage in out right tax evasion) The so-called 'war on women' which does not exist, but as a created myth is very useful to their purposes. Funny thing, the old Soviet Union, as a matter of political practice, deliberately created unrest in women and minority groups for the ultimate goal of spreading communist rule to the world. They failed. But our Democrats just seem to feel that communism just hasn't been tried by the right people yet.
Previous 11 - 20 Next