Perhaps, if Mr. Morgan thinks he would be safer in Great Britain, he just has a short memory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_Great_Britain

If Piers Morgan would take a couple of hundred thousand other liberal nuts with him, we would be for ever in his debt. :) I wonder if we could pay him to kidnap Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Debby Wasserman Schultz, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and any politicians who live in New York or California?

"The debate is over" is the absolute proof of the arrogant, stupidity, self-righteous, sanctimonious tyrannical nature of a liberal megalomaniacal wannabe tyrant. It impresses no one but the idiot who thinks it means something to other people. People who use that phrase in a discussion before everyone agrees that the debate is in fact over generally are so narrow minded in their sanctimonious self righteousness that they can see through a keyhole with both eyes. I wonder how many times King George figured the debate was over? LOL

Maybe a good name for that website should be "Homes NOT to break into in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties"

Methinks you don't think. But, given your chosen user name, "California Liberal, methinks no surprise in that. Out of curiosity, what would a liberal living in California know about shame? I thought shame was outlawed there years ago and relegated to the status of historical myth.

Funny how prior to the 1960s just about every body in America would have agreed that homosexuality is an abomination, something committed only by people with sick minds (yes, I was there) and today, it's the people who still believe that who are said to have sick minds, to be bigots Homosexuals have pretty much successfully transferred guilt from the guilty (themselves) onto the innocent (those who know the difference between sick minded and baby boomer justification of individual autonomy which has nothing to do with freedom but is all about "down with the establishment" which in America has proven to be the pathway to destruction Note: I refer to the establishment principles of the United States not the current mess of socialists in govt.

You have homosexuality confused with George Bush. Just ask any Democrat. LOL

So what? THE Bible is the one the founders including Jefferson used to create these United States along with a great deal of historical research seeking to discover how freedom could be ordered that it might be sustained Yes they recognized that it could not be sustained indefinitely only so long as the moral bedrock remained solid in the citizenry Just about all arguments of the left these days fly in the face of the founders, who would not recognize what they created in the mess we have today The discussion of gay marriage as it goes on would have turned their stomachs and using them to justify it would have infuriated them. But then "we the people of the secular church of what's happening now" wouldn't give a damn about that, would they

uh... plane, not plain oops

Absolutely right, iprazhm. Homosexuals love to talk about love. One of their popular arguments is that "52% of heterosexual marriages end in divorce" as if this clearly shows some kind of moral equivalence between heterosexual marriage and homosexual marriage. The reality is that it demonstrates no such equivalency. What it demonstrates is that even if a couple is heterosexual, using marriage as a license to sleep with each other is a bad idea. Using marriage as a license to have sex is like getting on a plain that is almost always guaranteed to crash.