It was while I was driving from Florida, where I gave a presentation on education to citizens, that I heard from talk show hosts about the abuse by North Carolina High School social studies teacher Tanya Dixon-Neely towards a student who dared to challenge her diatribe about Mitt Romney’s alleged “bullying” incident from 1965. In response to the student’s reference to Barack Obama’s own admission in his book of having shoved a girl, the teacher yelled that students can be arrested for disrespecting President Obama. “President” (King?) Obama was beyond criticism to Dixon-Neely, unlike “candidate” Mitt Romney.
The confusion of...












If you know better with evidence please share.
If not, it is conjecture.
That, for some ignorant reason she thinks the President can't be criticized. Does not make sense.
So, you're saying my defense based on evidence is weak, but his attack based on nothingbut his FEELINGS is right.