In response to:

Barack Obama Vs. Mitt Romney: 10 Big Differences Going "Forward"

Joe1626 Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 9:51 AM
These young who will vote Obama if they are not allowed to fry their brains on a variety of substances might want to consider this: If they put Obama in charge for four more years, they will never rise above the baement of their parents house. And when they do (At the death of their parents) they will all need to be comptent farmers to grow their own marujuana (Because there will be no international worth of American currency left) and they will need to agree to live dangerously, by keeping their private meth labs to satisfy their needs as their manufacturing neighbor will not bother producing the product for worthless money either. I am afraid they are faced with the most horrible fear to confront young Americans/democrats. cont'd
wmou Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 10:37 AM
Most of those I talk to are either in college or are recent college grads with jobs.

Not a bunch of useless pot or meth heads.
They are anti-republican because they believe the republicans want to control their personal lives.
Joe1626 Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 9:52 AM
They must make the choice to grow up or die. I'll be watching.

Forward is not a destination. If you'd asked Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot or their supporters if they were taking their nations forward, they'd have undoubtedly said "yes." Mussolini? Forward. Napoleon? Forward. Genghis Khan? Forward. Of course, Churchill, Thatcher, and Reagan would have said "forward" as well. So, that's why it's important to ask what difference it would make if we go forward for four years under Mitt Romney as opposed to going forward for another four years under Barack Obama.

1) Mitt Romney would try to reduce tax rates for the wealthy and corporations to spur economic growth. On the...

Related Tags: Obama Barack Obama