1 - 10 Next
He hasn't had a clue yet, but don't fret. His job is to do Obama's bidding, and he's been great at that. Problem is, that isn't in his oath of office, and that should get him removed from the public trough.
In response to:

Should The U.S. Declare War On ISIS?

Joe1592 Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 12:57 PM
Why drop the OUTSIDE of the capital cities? They don't get the OUTSIDE sort of message.
In response to:

Should The U.S. Declare War On ISIS?

Joe1592 Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 12:50 PM
We are not (yet) at war with ISIS, but ISIS is at war with us. Sort of like Slick Willie not having sex with Monica Lewinsky while she was having sex with him. Hillary will understand that.
In response to:

Should The U.S. Declare War On ISIS?

Joe1592 Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 12:45 PM
It seems inevitable that we will be at war (officially), so it might as well be sooner than later. That way, ISIL will not be stronger, and our military will not be weaker, than later on when Obama has had more time to weaken us. From Obama's point of view, though, later would be better, since he obviously wants ISIL (or anybody) to defeat USA. He has done his part to bolster ISIL and to weaken our military.
In response to:

White House Defends Immigration Actions

Joe1592 Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 9:35 PM
Let's see if I have this straight. Obama invites, directly or otherwise, hordes of children from Central America to come to the USA. This provokes thousands of new illegal immigrants to invade our Southern border. Obama busses thousands of them to other parts of the country, to "ease the conditions in TX." Some places, like Murrieta CA, repeatedly refuse to accept them. Obama needs more money to care for them. He will ask Congress for millions of dollars (or is it billions?) to handle them. Congress will be pressured to approve it, because "it's for the children." But most of the money will no doubt be channeled to Obama's supporters, and no improvement in border enforcement can be expected. Meanwhile, Obama's EPA is going to spend billions of dollars to require expensive and wasteful steps to "reduce carbon dioxide" in the atmosphere. By this time anyone but an idiot or a Democrat (I know, I repeat myself) knows that the global warming alarmists are not supported by true science, only by scientists who want to keep their job, or grant, by keeping alarmism alive. I say take the money from the EPA and enforce border security with that!
In response to:

The Muddy Mississippi Race

Joe1592 Wrote: Jun 29, 2014 11:27 AM
What law or Rule prevents McDaniel from mounting a write-in campaign? It worked for Murkowski in Alaska. Are their different rules for the House than there are for the Senate? As for the counties who illegally refuse to allow the election results to be examined, that's a legal matter that should be addressed. Having one Party's Primary on one date and the other Party's about 3 weeks later just begs for illegalities like someone voting in both. Likely there are over 7,000 somebodies who did it, but like true Democrats, the establishment RINOs will do their best to hide the facts. Living in "interesting times" sure has its downside!
In response to:

It’s Real: GlobalChange.Gov

Joe1592 Wrote: Jun 12, 2014 11:40 AM
Hey, Dawg, what you wrote are the REAL inconvenient truths regarding Algore's claims. But as long as Democrats keep proposing and executing inane laws to reduce carbon dioxide, we'll continue to throw money down a rat hole.
Beautiful! That's about where we are.
We have learned that both Obama and Susan Rice can be depended upon - to lie through their teeth! So whatever they may say, it shouldn't surprise or upset anyone with their eyes open.
All the coal-killing laws in the world won't have any discernible effect on global warming/climate change. Scientists have proved that warmer climates cause increased carbon dioxide, not the other way around. But Obama likes the previous bought-and-paid-for opinion, as it supports his notion that the USA needs to be taken down. And it makes no difference, as higher carbon dioxide levels improve agriculture and life on earth in general.
1 - 10 Next