In response to:

Why Mitt Lost and it Wasn’t Very Close

JoAnne127 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 12:08 PM
Some Guy, you definitely are NOT an idiot as "Birdbrain" below wrote. You are right. What no one seems to know, and I learned a long ago in TV, is the media does the voting, and Hollywood. A candidate must take an acting class next time. I'm stunned, and shocked by this crooked election, and it's going to take awhile for me to stabilize...can I sue? Esp. MSNBC, and Matthews who said "good thing we had Sandy Storm!" and poor Ambassador's relatives, and the rest of us who thank him along with the three others for giving their lives, and Obama IGNORING it, then Hillary lying about it. God help all the little babies who will not be born, and the next generation of food stamp addicts, not looking for jobs, that Mitt could create for them.
Stuart95 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 2:27 PM
The nation has already passed on Ron Paul, the man.

But Ron Paul's ideas are the only thing out there that make sense, and might have a chance of winning the country back form socialists if packaged by the right candidate.
Birdman III Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 12:14 PM
I read that someguy thinks Ron Paul was the amswer. I re-read that same idea. so I re-re-read that same idea.

He IS a fool.

Memorandum to the GOP: When running an election campaign it is often valuable to select a nominee who represents the rank and file of the Party. This is how other Parties do it. Perhaps you might get on board.

Who?

Well let’s start with who not to select.

There was George H.W. Bush, who, while a nice, honorable public servant, won primarily because of the record Reagan established. He lost because the rest of us thought that when he mouthed the words “Read my lips, go to Texas,” he meant “Read my lips, no new taxes.”  

There was Bob Dole,...