In response to:

The Truth in Love Police

JMWinPR Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 4:50 PM
Let me see if I understand what you are saying. It is wrong for someone to say he "believes in traditional marriage", but it is OK to invert a religious symbol and place it a jar of urine? (At taxpayers expense I might add). And who is going to sit in judgement of sad speech?
AZYaateeh Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 7:12 PM
"you know how dramatic they can get"?

Wow. Nice stereotyping there.
Ken6226 Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 5:11 PM
Liberals are always the victims, aren't they?
MyBodyMyChoice Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 4:55 PM
Look, Im not DEFENDING what the crazed gay guy did.....you know how dramatic they can get. I'm just saying it was a gay guy who was the one who tore down the wall.
Im sure eventually someone else...a woman or a Christian or a conservative or someone else would have done it.

Liberal academics have been using speech codes for years. They hear an idea they don't like and it makes them angry. But they don't quite know how to defeat the idea on its own merits. So instead of either a) taking the time to cool down and offer a rational response, or b) actually changing their view, they simply give in to the impulse to censor. That is why our campus speech codes really don't reduce so-called hate speech. They simply embolden those who hate speech.

I wish I could say that this childish inclination toward censorship is unique to liberal...