In response to:

Sam Tanenhaus's Problem Continues

jmg11 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 1:48 AM
He can answer it, as can dozens of regular TH commenters. Stick around, if anyone takes you seriously, you'll get the reasons.
geotay Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 2:44 PM
Tell Carl - He had the benefit of the subversive media, ACORN and a Soros company counting votes. I don't want him to think I took him seriously.

WASHINGTON -- It has happened again. Sam Tanenhaus, the editor of the New York Times Book Review referred to by Paul Krugman the other day as "a long-time conservative," has essayed in the New Republic the modern conservative movement, and traced us all back to John C. Calhoun. I suppose our point of origin could have been more sinister. Sam could have traced us back to Nathan Bedford Forrest, the former Confederate General who went on to be an early member of the Ku Klux Klan, but John C. Calhoun is bad enough.

Of course, Calhoun is no kind of modern...