In response to:

Hardness of Heart and the Celebration of Abortion

jmg11 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 6:59 PM
rmccarthy, In charity I observe that you must have figured out by now that you are on "scroll by" status with most of the commenters. Only a dolt could have missed it. You cannot contribute by filling the discussion with irrelevant one liners. It is time to recalibrate your weapon. Does that mean anything to you? When will it kick in? Hint: The correct answer is, "Pronto."
jmg11 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 8:27 PM
I would thank you if you had, or had made, a point.

Adios, rmcc. That seems to be 42 comments in this discussion alone, nothing to read. So troll on, brother. I will scroll on by.

Trolling, trolling, trolling on the river,....
rmccarthy Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 8:12 PM
Thank you for proving my point.
jmg11 Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 8:03 PM
rmmccarthy,

I am sure it is a tough point to accept, but I told you once. That's plenty for this purpose. So you just stay with it. We are going to find out whether or not it is faulty, aren't we?
rmccarthy Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:34 PM
jmg11: You seem to have jumped to a faulty conclusion, again.
rmccarthy Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 7:18 PM
God is in control, don't worry so much. Trust and obey Him not me or yourself. Complaints without Godly solutions are useless.

In 1995, feminist leader Naomi Wolf called for a pro-abortion movement “that acts with moral accountability and without euphemism,” noting that, “With the pro-choice rhetoric we use now, we incur three destructive consequences -- two ethical, one strategic: hardness of heart, lying and political failure.” That hardness of heart was fully manifest in the profane video produced by the Center for Reproductive Rights celebrating the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

But let’s go back to October 16, 1995, when the New Republic published Wolf’s remarkably candid article entitled, “Our Bodies, Our Souls.” Wolf made reference to “Dr. Joycelyn...