don't get it.... or do you? I think you do and that's why you are so offended and make the snarky comments you guys make.

Yeah, I am one of those "real" men as you call it, although I never cut a guys hair nor picked a fight. But I had to defend myself on a number of occasions and had several fist fights that were just boys butting heads until a fracas started. No, it wasn't considered bravery and only a pu$$y would have called it an attack back then. It was street justice and all they did was cut the guys hair, so more than one would be needed to hold him still. Now if Mitt had come with 5 guys and they beat the you know what out of the guy, that would have been cowardly on Mitt's part. Among boys & men to be a coward was the worst shame possible. That's just how it was in those days. It's amusing reading the comments from beta males, like you. You just

Now it would be consider that. In those days not, regardless of what laws were on the books. In those days a boy and/or his dad would be ashamed to bring charges over something like this. It would be the same as admitting you and your son were both "sissies", "not Men". It was an unwritten code among the majority of men in that era. Today's metro-sexual beta male brainwashed by feminism guys aren't ashamed of being "pu$$ie$". In those days 'P' was the scarlet letter for males. That's how it was and all the whining, hand wringing and panty wadding by PatLib et al can't change that.

Why? Because I gave an accurate account of how boys behaved in 1965 and what the culture was like for us in that era? Because I'm not ashamed of myself and offer no apology? I'd rather be a barbarian than a Beta Male anyday. Isn't that the title of a song? Here's another song title from back in the day, "I'd Rather Be an Idiot Than a Whiny Candy @$$". It made it to number one in..... 1965.

Cinematic soundbites. That's funny. Even funnier is your angry reaction. Name calling? Challenging my "manhood"? ROTFL. I guess I should tell you to "grow a pair hippie." ;)

didn't approve of all the "individualism crap written in the Saturday Evening Post". Back then, men were men, and women were glad. That's why "Mad Men" is so popular and has spawned a retro-fad. Don Draper would have done the same thing as Mitt. Barbaric? Perhaps. But all male. Way to go Mitt! PS: boys had fist fights pretty routinely in those days and no one made anything of it. It was known as the manly art of self defense. Lauber should have been prepared to fight or conform. That's how it was. I like Mitt better now.

Just to throw in my historical 2 cents worth: this incident happened at a private boarding school with a dress code, in 1965. I was in HS then myself, although not a private one. This general type incident was not uncommon in 1965. Lauber was breaking the rules. Following the rules was a very important thing in those days. Especially when everyone else was following them. Good for Mitt for imposing some street justice. Lauber is lucky this was a private school for young gentlemen. He would have gotten worse in public school. We didn't have all this free will, do you own thing, 'spress yourself libertine culture smog in those days. We were being raised by "The Greatest Generation" who learned order and discipline while winning WWII and

Apparently you are correct about the TP being in Mitt's corner. The facts are that Mitt is more of a liberal POS than Gingrich or Santorum. How dumb are the TPers voting for Mitt that they don't know this? Pretty effing dumb if they think Mitt is more conservative the Newt or Rick.

Apparently you missed the point. Paul has zero chance of stopping Romney and he's in cahoots with Mitt to boot. So, what are you talking about?

... of the population. Ah well, bring on the collapse. I'm ready. Good luck to you city types without land, guns, gold etc. If things turn around, great. If they don't... well you get the picture.