I never said that are no liberal Republicans. You want to decide what the meaning of words are in way that is different and over generalized. You want to lower the intellectual content of my comment down and then argue against it, the so called straw-man argument. Once again, I did not say in the comment that all liberals are Democrats etc. Yet you once again imply that I am too stupid to get it. You assign a fallacy that was not there in the comment and then act like you are teaching me I am wrong. Yet I never made the fallacy. So you have made the mental error, not me.

Liberalism created science? Where did you get that?

I have not governed. If I was in charge, spending would be slashed 60% the first year or as much as possible considering having massive government types like you in congress to stop it from happening. Scott Walker cut spending, and Illinois had the stupid idea of keeping spending the same amount as they were and increasing taxes. Illinois has unemployment going up and debt going up while Wisconsin is the opposite. Character? You voted for Obama, the biggest liar to ever walk inside the White house, huh? And you are talking to me about character? Stop.

I have not governed. If I was in charge, spending would be slashed 60% the first year or as much as possible considering having massive government types like you in congress to stop it from happening. Scott Walker cut spending, and Illinois had the stupid idea of keeping spending the same amount as they were and increasing taxes. Illinois has unemployment going up and debt going up while Wisconsin is the opposite.

It is important that your California out of control debt ideas stop being implemented on a national scale. We already know your ideas do not work. The interest rates are low because they are printing money and buy treasuries with it. You can only do that for a limited time before it explodes in your face. Never in history, has anyone ever done that and avoided hyperinflation ever. Each time they thought they were going to be the ones to succeed. You are totally wrong. We will not allowed you to destroy our country in this way like you did California. It will not happen.

Unemployment and debt are higher on average in blue states. In 2009, this was especially true when comparing the most conservative states to the most liberal. If the liberal states had the same employment rate as the conservatives states then, there would probably would not have had a recession.

The economics of this is very very clear to non-liberals.

How do you know what I think? You don't. The debt is currently causing a slight drag on the economy because interest is consuming money that could go to tax relief. But the debt is a growing problem that will cause a very large problem very soon. It is very heavily effecting monetary policy which in turn will affect the economy. You like to use your simple illogical interpretation of what I think and argue against it. You are not arguing with me, but a straw man argument you keep setting up to make it easier for your. Liberalism is wrong so how else can you win the argument?

Smart people do not see it that way at all. California sees it that way. The debt is totally out of control and unemployment is really high and they want to raise taxes and make the whole problem even worse. Wisconsin did not raise taxes and cut spending. Their unemployment and debt is going down. Illinois did the stupid liberal think of raising taxes and spending to create consumption and unemployment and debt is high. Liberalism does not work.

I am strongly against government spending in all business cycles. I believe the government spending should always be as small as possible and taxes should be as low as possible. If I believed as you say, then I would be wrong. I do not believe as you say that I do. You are in error. If I was in charge we would have a giant surplus and no government debt would be possible.