In response to:

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

jimmylynn Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 8:53 AM

rmarks, I think you are not seeing the forest for the trees. Polls are not accurate and also ripe for fraud. Why would you want to compare a fraud to a fraud? What you should be comparing to for a general view of the magnitude of the voting fraud problem is the number of legal age voters a state has, the number that registered to vote, and the actual number of votes cast in that election. If the number of votes cast exceeds either of the latter two factors....there is fraud. The number of votes cast which exceeded those previous two factors will give you an idea of just how bad the problem is.

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Read Full Story

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...

Related Tags: Fraud Election 2012 Voter Fraud Barack Obama Swing States election fraud Election