Ms. Glick, You are an extremely thought provoking woman. Well studied and articulate. You are also a very attractive woman. I like you. If I were single and thirty years younger, I might even try and look you up to invite you out to dinner.

Ms. Glick, You are an extremely thought provoking woman. Well studied and articulate. You are also a very attractive woman. I like you. If I were single and thirty years younger, I might even try and look you up to invite you out to dinner.

It makes sense that it unfolded that way???? I guess you could make that determination for people that have no sense.

Doesn't those bonuses speak for themselves, except for maybe with a few bone-heads? Yes, the next question would be, "Who approved those bonuses and the move to the Obama Care program?". Follow the money.

I disagree also, but for more than racial reasons. Obama had multiple throngs of supporters of varying interests. Some were strictly voting for racial reasons, some for free stuff, some for ideology, some just from their own stupidity and gullibility, while still others for crony payoffs. I'm sure we could find an array of other reasons voters voted for Obama, but in the end, if this cavalcade of special interests did not rise to the challenge of electing Obama, he could always depend on voter fraud to carry him across the finish line in first place.

I thought it was OK the way Ransom wrote it.

Well let's put it this way......anyone not strictly following the Obama script are subjected to his power trips.

There are no virtuous, lofty goals of left or right politicians. Government is the tool of the corrupt to impose their will, reap their rewards, and garner their power. Liberals want to expand government. Politicians can control the masses more easily with the more government we have. Tools such as more regulations, more taxes, more laws put control and power in the hands of our elected leaders. The left has no monopoly on this tool and thus the struggle between left, right, and independent. Americans, living their lives as free from oppression as possible, can only attempt to curtail the size and scope of government in the hope that in so doing they can preserve their freedom and their way of life.

I drew my conclusions during Obama's first term in office and he hasn't proven me wrong yet. He's really a very consistent fellow.

With the power and resources of the federal government at your disposal, it's very easy to overwhelm smaller organizations with these costs. Don't you like your tax dollars being wasted in such a manner?