In response to:

A Solid Romney Win Where It Matters

jimmylynn Wrote: Oct 22, 2012 11:50 PM
I also like the fact that Romney worked in Obama's off-mic conversation with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. If you noticed Obama grimaced at the mention of it and he walked away from it quietly, choosing not to respond to it during his next rebuttal.
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 12:40 AM
Yep, Let hope others caught it as well.
jimmylynn Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:10 AM
I wish Romney wouldn't have let Obama off that easy. I wish he would have brought it up again and crammed it in Obama's face.

When analyzing who won a debate, you can look at a number of factors: Who achieved their overarchhing objective, who had the most memorable lines, who might have left behind ticking time bombs in terms of statements that will return to haunt them.  Looking at any of the three, Romney was the clear winner, and Obama the loser.

Obviously, Romney's overarching objective wasn't to score debate points on Benghazi or Syria.  It was to prove that he is competent, calm, knowledgeable and -- most emphatically -- not a warmonger.  It was to make sure he seemed presidential.  He achieved it.  By...