1 - 10 Next
Are you joking?!? The internet is FULL of hedonistic propagandists.
What aren't the "champions of free speech", so supportive of Charlie Hebdo's hate speech, defending Kelvin Cochran? Because the PC crowd are hypocrites.
After the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, liberals and “progressives”, so vehement in their outrage, proclaiming the sanctity of freedom of speech, and that Charlie Hebdo had a “right to offend”. And offensive they were: just do a web search of their so-called “art”, and take note of their extremely vulgar and offensive images, especially towards Islam and Christianity. In fact, Charlie Hebdo’s so-called “art” fits the definition of hate speech: “speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability.” So where were all these “champions of liberty” when the television show Duck Dynasty was under attack because Phil Robertson made statements supporting traditional marriage? Or when the Benham Brothers’ Flip it Forward television show was cancelled due to public outrage over their comments on homosexuality? Or the campaign to cancel the TV show 19 Kids and Counting because of the anti-LGBT activism and statements of the Duggar family? Are homosexuals and other deviants a “sacred cow”, that no one can dare criticize?
Good, let them leave the northern states. I'll stay here. I will not live in (or visit) a state where no one ever wears shoes.
In response to:

How to Get Away With Sleazy Sex Scenes

Jim185 Wrote: Nov 14, 2014 12:08 PM
Even Family Feud runs on double entendres and "naughty" puns. The media, and especially Hollywood is run by those who pander to the Sexual Left (who believe sexual gratification is the be-all and end-all of life).
In response to:

An Old Hatred Returns

Jim185 Wrote: Nov 06, 2014 12:13 PM
Then again, criticizing Israel or its policies does not warrant the "anti-semite!" slur being hurled, anymore than criticizing Obama or his obamanable polices warrant being called "racist!".
Libertarians are FAR more liberal than the most liberal Democrat when it comes to social issues. A true Libertarian would wholeheartedly support ALL items of the 1972 Gay Rights Platform (including group marriages and elimination of all age-of-consent laws). A true Libertarian would support making ALL recreational drugs illegal.
So, the Nobel Prize committee snubbed Mahatma Gandhi, year after year, but gave the Peace Prize to Obama after he was in office for about eight months. Obama was certainly a "do-nothing" President then (it took him two weeks to pick out a dog). But can't the Nobel Prize committee take it back?
Yep. Alfred Nobel is spinning in his grave.
In response to:

BREAKING: Eric Holder to Resign

Jim185 Wrote: Sep 25, 2014 3:53 PM
1 - 10 Next