In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

jfultz Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 5:45 PM
I am not an overly religous person, so I am not the best person to even be commenting on this contraversary, but I will say this. I am so glad that Indiana has a person like Richard Mourdock as a candidate for US Senate and I hope everybody, 100% will vote for him. He is a man of deep love for life, and his answers to questions do not change when the audience does. Given one minute to answer the question, Richard Mourdock answered with conviction, not even considering if it would cost him votes or not. If he had had an hour to think about it, he would have answered the same, but maybe with a little explanation.I know Richard and am damn proud to call him a friend. He has more integrity in his little finger than Pelosi Joe has in his whole b

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...