In response to:
Idiots. Under God was added in the 50s and DOES NOT denote how spiritual a person is if they choose to refer to the ORIGINAL pledge as it was INTENDED.
You clowns who sputter biblical verse and the Constitution in it's purist, literal form should appreciate that.
Note that the good Revrund's ad is a nondiscrimination spot. I guess discriminating against God is perfectly fine for this "man of God"--um, I meant black man of God.
every ws adopted at some point
what a clueles fool you are
How's the guvmint cheese these days?
not it is reserved as a term of endearment between blacks
but no one is suggesting we should start using it again
accepted speech changes over time and using under God in the pledge has been considered a part of accepted speech
that is of course, except for those who hate America and profess that religion is a crutch for weak minded repubs
although we do notice that for the imbeciles that support and adore the hussein, he has become their lord and savior and their messiah
There are law-abiding, hard-working, tax-paying blacks.
And there are N's. Plantation ghetto biotsch N's.
By choice, of course.
Just like the law-abiding, hard-working, tax-paying blacks choose to be as such.