The DC Circuit Court of Appeals today unanimously slapped down the controversial “recess” appointments President Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board way back in early January of 2012, in what the Associated Press rightly calls an “embarrassing setback.” Indeed, if the Supreme Court upholds the decision, it very well may nullify everything the board has done since the appointments, as it won’t have actually had the quorum of three members required to issue regulations. Ouch.
The unanimous decision is an embarrassing setback for the president, who made the appointments after Senate Republicans spent months blocking...












When you demonstrate that your knowledge is so sadly lacking, it would probably serve you well to refrain from posting.
The recess appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution is limited to intersession recesses, not intra-session adjournments.
The Senate was operating on a unanimous consent agreement (majority democrats, in case you forgot), which provided that the Senate would meet in pro forma sessions every three business days from December 20, 2011, through January 23, 2012.
Therefore, president Ø violated the Constitution, thus making his appointments un-Constitutional.
Learn about the filibuster, it is not un-Constitutional