1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Will Brian Williams Lose His Job?

Jerry6614 Wrote: Feb 05, 2015 11:20 PM
Absolutely fire that lying sack of manure. He not only lied in 2003 on national TV on Letterman, who was fawning all over him, but again in 2008 and now again this week at the hockey game and even today when he claims it was the fog of war that made him lose his memory. That BS could not even be bought by an Obama supporter. NO ONE every forgets if they got shot down in a helicopter crash or was under attack. I was in an airplane crash and not a week goes by that somehow I do not think of it due go burns I received. That is a monumental life experience and for him to blame that on some memory fog shows he is still LYING. Fire his sorry butt since no one can believe a thing he says anymore.
In response to:

The Problem with Romney Nostalgia

Jerry6614 Wrote: Jan 26, 2015 7:08 PM
Amen to both of those comments Jerry. Mitt sees the world through rose colored glasses. He told me he thought Obama was a nice guy just had bad policies. He does not see him for who he is and lost the election because he failed to attack his opponent, who incidentally mercilessly attacked Mitt. Cruz is the smartest, most articulate and gustiest of the contenders and he will not back down from Pillary. He is my choice #1 and Scott Walker #2.
And Coburn should fire himself too for ever believing Obama is a man to be loved. He has been the worst President of my lifetime and that goes back to Roosevelt. Nor is he a "nice guy". He is a thin skinned, arrogant , despotic leader and a proven liar. Whats not to love about those traits? The 2014 elections showed what voters thought of them.
It would be a close call between he and Joe Biden, thats how much I think of another Bush as a candidate.
In response to:

Dear Mitt and Jeb: No, Thanks

Jerry6614 Wrote: Nov 03, 2014 9:01 PM
I agree with Mary Carol. He is a nice guy but wimpy. Almost too nice. I told him at a organizing exploratory fund raiser in La Jolla ( where he now lives) that he could not run another McCain campaign and had to take on Obama for what he was, a socialist -Marxist who had an agenda from Alinsky, Rev. Wright and his other mentors like Franklin Davis. His response was that Obama was a nice guy and just had some misguided policies. Mitt did not get it then and I am not sure he does now, even after the dirty tricks with Crowley and the way Obama portrayed Mitt. We need a street fighter with moxy and brains who is willing to call out the Democrat nominee (Hillary or whoever) for what they are and what they stand for. Ted Cruz is a guy with guts. I don't know if he will be our nominee but he willing to fight, is not afraid of the media or the Democrats and their enablers. He is also a brilliant guy. Jeb and Mitt are about as inspirational as John Boehner or Mitch McConnell.
In response to:

Where Was President Obama?

Jerry6614 Wrote: Oct 24, 2014 6:51 PM
Typical liberal. Did not understand the message. The issue Michelle is addressing is where was BHO in not speaking out against these acts and calling them what they were; Acts of Terrorism by Islamic jihadists and Muslim terrorists. Not "workplace violence", not "senseless acts of violence" but murders by terrorists, which is what Canada called them immediately. He cannot bear to say the words terrorism in conjunction with Islam because that is his religion. Well, other than the black liberation theology of Rev. Wright who preaches the same message of hate as do the Islamic terror groups.
He would not want to deal with the Dimmocrats anymore than we do.
Its just more big government piled on an already oppressive system. Once in place, states would be demanding more and more money and Santa Claus (Feds )would dole it out like ice cream cones to kids wanting sweets. How about eliminating the programs that are no longer needed first or better yet, all of these welfare programs and let each state decide what it wants to do in the way of welfare. That way we eliminate one bureaucracy which has an unlimited alimentary canal.
In response to:

Beau Bergdahl’s Duty—And Ours

Jerry6614 Wrote: Jul 22, 2014 8:22 PM
Sorry Ken, we do know he deserted his post and walked out of the Camp without permission and he was looking for the Taliban. He was not taken by the tooth fairy nor captured by a hairy monster nor given drugs or any other fantasy trip. And we know that American soldiers were killed looking for him because his former comrades were among them and they know when the deaths occurred and who died. So do the parents now know and they are rightfully upset. Pictures of him with his new Taliban friends and walking freely around a camp and even given a weapon show he was not always a prisoner. They guy's letters home and distaste for the American military preceded his leaving without authorization and violating his duty. The real issue is what are is our military going to do about it? He has to be court martialed and he can tell his story if he wants. I doubt he will testify about anything.
That is what a court marital is you idiot. He gets to present his defense. Its not a "marshall" either. That is usually an officer of the law. Remember Marshall Dillion?
1 - 10 Next