In response to:

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

Jerry555 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:27 PM
Yea, the Elite send their kids to schools like this, but not yours. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/23/School-Obama-s-Daughters-Attend-Has-11-Armed-Guards-Not-Counting-Secret-Service
Loiso12013 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:30 PM
if you can't afford to send your kids to private school - - blame yourself!!
Quintus_T_Cicero Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:36 PM
loonies01:

The problem is the elites tell us how great public education is, yet refuse to use it for their kids.
Loiso12013 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:41 PM
because the public school system's budgets have been bled dry - how do you expect a good education from a school that has no funds?
scrow Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:51 PM
If our taxes weren't going to pay for public schools, maybe we could...
Texan1984 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:53 PM
Bled dry by fatazs beaurocrats, empowered by socialist utopioans such as yourself LowAsz.
katarina3 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 1:01 PM
Lois - If Barry Soetero wasn't Pres he wouldn't of been able to afford the school either since we pay. Nor go on any of the swell vacations the taxpayers send him, his fat wife & kids on - not to mention fat Michelle's mother & friends that come along with them.
Face it - the Soetero/Obamas are the biggest welfare gimme "people" ever
Paul08 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 1:05 PM
The United States spends more money per child on education than most countries. IF there isn't enough money, it is because it is wasted on bureaucrats and socailists schemes to indoctrination of the children.
Bea44 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 2:53 PM
Louse: ......"because the public school system's budgets have been bled dry..."? You bet, but the Teachers' Unions.
Bea44 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 2:54 PM
"by the Teachers' Unions". My typing is erroneous. Apologies galore!
MudontheTires Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 4:34 PM
"because the public school system's budgets have been bled dry"

"Bled dry" by who?

Your fellow progs, that's who.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is apparently up in arms because the National Rifle Association released an ad asking simple yet important question: If President Obama’s kids are protected by professional armed guards -- why can’t yours be, too?

I agree with the governor on a number of substantive points, but here are two things to consider:

1. The NRA -- at no point during their advertisement -- explicitly attacked Sasha and Malia Obama by name. Yes, they imply that the “president’s children” -- because of who they are -- have certain...