1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Israel's Justice Minister Tells Off UN

jerry2 Wrote: Jul 24, 2014 7:16 AM
Why does the U.S. continue to house and fund the U.N.? If we pulled our financial support, this abomination would collapse immediately.
You would think that Detroit would be a shining example of socialist -- er, Democrat -- politics. Actually, it is a shining example of the result of Democrat control.
No one has a right to goods and services. If you want water, pay for it. If you want food, pay for it. Electricity? It can be bought. Gas? Buy it. Why are these people not embarrassed to get in the streets and demand that someone take them to raise?
Why should Iran do anything that would tend to slow their plutonium enrichment program? We have already relieved them of the sanctions. If we had really wanted to do something, we would have left the sanctions in place until verifiable controls were in place. We obviously never had any intention of doing anything except what we have done -- release the sanctions so Iran can continue its enrichment projects. Our resistance to Iran's atomic program are just about as strong as our resistance to illegal immigration.
Would someone at the IRS explain how a hard drive crash on Learner's computer destroyed the emails on the server? Or how does the IRS generate and deliver emails without a server handling the transactions? I can destroy the hard drive at my office today and all the emails on it will still be available on several servers. I work for a small company. How can the IRS not have multiple servers and redundancy?
Isn't the term "pro-life Democrat" and oxymoron?
Education in America has declined in direct proportion to federal involvement in education. We should eliminate the federal Department of Education and return education control to state and local boards.
In response to:

Obama's Border Crisis Lies

jerry2 Wrote: Jul 10, 2014 7:01 PM
" The House should pass a simple repeal of the 2008 Trafficking Act and say they will consider Obama's supplemental request after he starts enforcing the pre-2008 border procedures." Yes. Nothing should be given to this administration or even considered until the current laws are enforced. Repeal the 2008 Trafficking Act and start sending these criminals home. Then ask for assistance to accelerate the process of deportation. Obama has absolutely no intention of doing anything to stem the tide of illegal immigrants. He created the problem and does not see it as a problem to be fixed.
Obama wants 3.7 billion dollars to process and settle thousands more illegal immigrants in the U.S. He should get exactly zero dollars for his illegal plan. If he really wanted to address the issue, he would be deporting these immigrants as soon as they arrive. He has no intention to ever secure the border or deal with immigration except as amnesty.
If we simply enforced the laws we already have, we could control illegal immigration. Obama wants more laws so he can find an opportunity for amnesty. Just say NO!
1 - 10 Next