Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Is USC Another Left-Wing Seminary?

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 12:46 AM
Do you know how stupid you sound to call anything you don't like political correctness? So under you belief, it would have been wrong for a political science professor in 1964 to offer an opinion on the Civil rights movement or Dr. King? Or in 1973, a poli sci professor an opinion on Watergate? That would be absurd. I majored in political science, there are a number of subgroups within it. Liberalism is a subgroup within it as is conservativism.
In response to:

Is USC Another Left-Wing Seminary?

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 12:46 AM
Do you know how stupid you sound to call anything you don't like political correctness? So under you belief, it would have been wrong for a political science professor in 1964 to offer an opinion on the Civil rights movement or Dr. King? Or in 1973, a poli sci professor an opinion on Watergate? That would be absurd. I majored in political science, there are a number of subgroups within it. Liberalism is a subgroup within it as is conservativism.
In response to:

Is USC Another Left-Wing Seminary?

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 11:25 PM
Amazing how much Prager whines about colleges, for someone with numerous advanced college degrees. Is he going to give them back?
In response to:

Is USC Another Left-Wing Seminary?

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 11:23 PM
Dennis does realize this is a political science professor, right? While I don't agree with everything he said, it isn't wrong for a political science professor to offer an opinion, on you know, politics.
Really, that isn't what he said? Let's see he mentioned NAMBLA and beastility. NAMBLA is an organization that lobbies for sex with children, including young children. That isn't association gay couples with child molestors? Please tell me what Dr. Carson meant exactly?
Amazing the video wasn't erased, as police are commonly in the happen of "accidentally" erasing video when it shows them in a bad light. Photographyisnotacrime.com has many such videos of this happening.
In response to:

Drinking the Same-Sex "Marriage" Kool-Aid

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 11:13 PM
By the way, you chose to be ex-gay? Fine, why don't you allow those who don't choose to make that choice to be gay and to marry the people they love.
In response to:

Drinking the Same-Sex "Marriage" Kool-Aid

Jerome41 Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 11:13 PM
Pro-gay marriage advocate aren't trying to deny marriage to heterosexual couples, including those opposed to their right and ability to marry. You want to talk about personal attacks, on many right-wing websites I have read about gays called, perverts, f-ggots and other horrible names, usually by those who consider themselves good Christians. You are the one selfish, imposing your will and probably your religion on others who just want the right to marry their loved ones, as you have. That is selfish.
No scientist has ever said that carbon alone was the cause of warning. Second, science is about continual observations and data, unlike religion which is believe whatever an old, dusty book tells you, and don't dare question it at all.
Ransom no scientist or group or anyone ever said that carbon was solely responsible for global warming. Do you know what a strawman argument is Ransom, because you made a classic example of one. Second, there is still going to be warming, just reducing these other pollutants will reduce the rate of growth, but there will still be growth.
So the argument by the anti-gay activists is if there is same sex marriage, then heterosexuals won't reproduce and have sex? Is this a serious argument? I am pretty sure children are still being born in Massachusetts and they have had marriage equality for about a decade now.
Previous 21 - 30 Next
Saturday, May 25 | 04:36 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 04:36 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 04:36 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 04:36 AM ET