In response to:

Middle Fingers at the White House

Jeremiah Smirking Wrote: Jun 26, 2012 8:29 AM
Perverted? That's a loaded word. Homosexuality perverts the purpose of the sexual design, which is intended for intercourse towards the reproduction of the species. Narcissistic? By design human psychology is drawn to the other, of which homosexuality is drawn to the same. Pigs? You've been listening to too many Islamists. Destroy the family? Not possible, but activists would like to dismiss the family. Ruin the country? No, just bring the country into the ruin that is their life. Molest children? See priest scandal in the Catholic church. Agents of Satan? No, sorry. Just very broken people, suffering from something akin to an eye ailment, unable to see in themselves what everyone else sees in them.
Imagine this:

A future Republican president invites Tea Party leaders to the White House. Some of them have themselves photographed standing in front of a portrait of President Barack Obama with their middle fingers extended. They then posted these photos on Facebook with the caption "F--k Obama." (Needless to say, the F-word was spelled out.)

Some questions:

1. How much coverage do you think the national press would give to this?

2. How would Democratic -- and Republican -- leaders react?

3. How would Tea Party activists react?

The answers:

1. The mainstream media across America would widely report what had happened and repeatedly show these photos. "The...