1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Who Wouldn't Enjoy Firing These People?

Jeff3688 Wrote: Jan 12, 2012 10:02 AM
I would, in some instances, prefer to be able to "fire upon" such persons (giving them the benefit of the doubt as to their "personhood").
Let's see: if she's tired of being stereotyped as an "angry, black woman", it would appear she has 3 options: a) change her gender b) change her race c) change her attitude I'm betting she won't do any of them.
What's the point of his "September announcement of a new 'jobs' plan"? If he really HAD a plan, and thought it would work, why on earth would he wait until next month to unveil it?
In response to:

Rand Paul's Plans: Slash and Burn

Jeff3688 Wrote: Nov 02, 2010 1:35 PM
I proudly voted for Paul this morning (at the poll when it opened at 6:00 AM EDT, 9th in line).
In response to:

Tune In, Turnout, Turnover

Jeff3688 Wrote: Nov 01, 2010 2:04 PM
"the romantic notion of electing the country's first black president" Obama himself would disagree with this. In his own words, we elected the first "mutt". He does not claim to be black. His racial heritage is not black. He is not black.
The stuff I flush down my toilet daily is more sophisticated, intellectually speaking, than the cabal running the White House these days.
Sestak is a worthless piece of sh*t himself. His performance in the Obamacare drama showed that there simply is no such thing as a "pro-life Democrat". His posturing was simply meant to make him look more conservative than he is. He was looking for cover so he could vote for it, and jumped at the "obvious to anybody with a brain larger than a slug's" lie about an "executive order". He deserves to sleep in a septic tank the rest of his (hopefully) miserable life.
In response to:

This Is a Referendum, Not an Election

Jeff3688 Wrote: Oct 26, 2010 12:59 PM
Every election has been "...above all about America". That the far too many of the American people have failed--REPEATEDLY, and to their everlasting moral shame--to understand that fact does not change that fact. "What will it hurt if one crappy [Democrat] politician gets elected from my district?" The problem is that crappy [Democrat] politicians are like AIDS cells, cancer cells, thermonuclear warheads. In aggregate, they become exponentially worse than the sum of them.
If nothing else, perhaps we can take away from this the "positive" that traditional "civil rights leaders" [read: racial agitators and non-white racists] seem to be losing their power to sway the society (since, as everyone with a brain already realizes, "racism" in America is no longer a significant problem). For too long, they've held Democrats under their snake-charmer's sway, and bullied the rest of us. The NEGATIVE, of course, is that they're being replaced by muslim grievance mongers, hustlers and terrorists.
In response to:

Obama Would Rather Ignore Fiscal Truths

Jeff3688 Wrote: Oct 08, 2010 11:29 AM
"Another stubborn fact the president chooses to ignore." Thus, we are perfectly justified in calling O-Bama-Lama-Ding-Dong an "ignore-amus".
1 - 10 Next
Friday, June 01 | 10:52 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:52 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:52 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 10:52 PM ET