Previous 21 - 30 Next
So where do you go with this, we are outlawing the use of tobacco smoke but including the use of Pot Smoke. We pemit drugs with cute cultured definitions of wording, like recreational use of drugs. As if sticking the word recreational will improve our lives anymore than recreational use of cocaine would harm us any more. So do we include cocaine as an acceptable form of drug use? Sure, Its "my body and I will do what ever I want with it". Sounds awfully similar to the feminist aborting babies in a recreational sort of way at the good Dr.Gosnell's office. It's my body, and I will do whatever I want with it. It's my right man". Go right ahead people. Release a product with no chemical restrictions in it or guaranteed product standards.
Not to rain on your parade. But why would you legalize a product into the whole population when there is no available test to determine if the user of this product is legal within a framework of acceptability to be operating equipment common to the population with which we all share. It's bad enough we have drunk drivers, but why would you release millions of incoherent fools totally enebriated by the use of Pot! Do you even have a " Road Side Test " that can be used by our Police Services like a Breathalyzer which can immediately test the Consumer as Drugged or Safe to the Public. As far as I know there is no Road Side Test currently available for criminal determination of suspect. There are Blood Tests, but they take time.
sure is a lot of progressive revising of historical facts and institutional definitions to fit their agenda. I didn't realize when I woke up this morning in Canada I had an inalienable right to US citizenship. Come to think of it, the US government wants to tax me differently than what southern border Hispanic don't pay to cheat their way across a border and get their inalienable rights for citizenship, plus food stamp vouchers and ObamaCare. I guess you have to cheat a lot and very often to get noticed by Democrats.
In response to:

What is Planned Parenthood Hiding?

Jeff293 Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 12:59 AM
? how is "Planned Parenthood" anything what it claims to be as in planned --- parenthood. So far, the only planning in Planned Parenthood is the frontal assault using a glitzy name called Planned as in establishing an organized thought process which leaves the person believing "if I plan something" I will hopefully get to the end of the journey. So far, what do we understand about Planned Parenthood? Well, they advocate the end of child, before any planning of parenthood is even discussed. Kinda putting the cart in the front of the horse huh? How does an organization that calls itself Planned promote Death Before Planning? Strange, but expected huh from liberals.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

Jeff293 Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 12:49 AM
no "marriage" isn't a right, it's a benefit of approved discrimination. You have a "Right" to breath, a "Right" not to be killed. But you do not have a "right" to marriage, Because as much as anything in marriage, 55% of those who do choose marriage divorce. Is Divorce a Right in reciprical to Marriage? Then there should be no penalty in divorcing since there is no right to claim restitution from a bad marriage as it wasn't my right to be inflicted with a poor choice in marriage.
In response to:

Gays Don’t Have a Right to Marriage

Jeff293 Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 12:43 AM
I was told whilst in school that government has limited actual "discrimination" to a very few areas. One we all agreed to was Pornography, for obvious reasons. But the first true Government Approved Discrimination has been Marriage. It's been an approved form of discrimination going back eons of time. And I don't have sufficient typing space to describe all the reasons why, except, Marriage benefitted the State because of the institution of Marriage produced other new citizens. By giving Married Couples specific benefits that Non-Married Couples couldn't get, it enticed Non Married people to bond in long term arrangements which usually meant offspring of the bonded couple provided back to government new citizens, called Children.
I enjoyed listening to Bob Lounsbury from Rochester AM Radio. fundementally he doesn't agree with Gay Marriage, but hey we Straight people do such a lousy job taking responsibility for our "traditional marriage". As Bob described, Gay society makes up less than 2% of total society. And Traditional Society makes up 98%. Of which 55% plus divorce. Of female partners, half are having children out of wedlock, and a many more don't get married at all. So who is doing more harm to the institution of marriage? So far, traditional marriage promoters are doing a pretty lousy job defending traditional marriage from a traditional marriage standpoint. Sounds a tad hypocritical to tell Gays they can't when we do so poorly ourselves.
I'm at a loss on this issue. If Gays were so adamant concerning "scouting". Why don't they form their own version of Scouting with their Gay Agenda attached to their Organization? Really! Why do hetrosexual aligned people have to continually capitulate our values to accomodate a Gay alternate lifestyle. What about the hetero sexual young males who are being instructed by other hetero Scout Masters. Don't or can't hetero young males have a "right" likewise not be be burdened with biased conflicting commentary from homosexual males? Can't a young male be instructed in an environment of common sexuality? How are young males to learn what is being Normal Male if from the time they enter school they are bombarded with progressive liberalism.
with so much public education Teachers (Unionists) pumping all this hot air into the heads of impressionable students. It's no wonder the public educational system is loaded with dream of grandiere running through their heads. A breeding ground of intellectuals being flooded with Peace Corp with NO PAYCHECKS. Guys like Soros getting doe eyed liberals coming out of university where smoke of progressivism is being blown up their backsides. They work their backsides off believing exactly like they were told all through high school and college. That "they are going to change the world", all done for free of course. But they were going to change the world, and kumbiya for all. Soros gets a groupie buring at both ends of the candle.
I thought for a moment on your claim, but I have to ask. Why are poor people consistently poor and why do error prone people constantly making mistakes, and why are accident prone people smashing their fingers when swinging a hammer? People who make decisions will have a proportion of those that consistently make bad bad choices. And no matter how much bubble wrap or bottom up redistribution of wealth that comes from the rich 2%ers. There are a massive number of twits who will be making the same ultimate impailments to prove progressive ideology cannot support these them. No matter how many Top Wage earners it takes to support bad judgement. We live in a freedom based society. One which even liberals have to admit. Freedom of choice suck
In response to:

Obama: "We Are Not a Deadbeat Nation"

Jeff293 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 4:41 PM
Sorry to break it to ya liberal Democrats, but the reality sucks when you live your life in a Bubble Wrap existence of progressivism. YES YOU ARE A NATION OF DEADBEATS. You are borrowing vastly more than you are taking in. And the next four years of entitlement driven liberals will further put you in the DEADBEAT class of countries.
Previous 21 - 30 Next