1 - 10 Next
what an interesting dilemma. Here you have Obama basically sitting on his butt while millions of actual applicants of legal immigration wait a long time whilst US Immigration Department people sort through the Applicant forms. There's an awful lot of money spent on the Department of Immigration. So I beg to question Democrats supporting Amnesty of Illegals, what do you do with the millions of legal applicants whom have spent years trying to prove their Application Form to US Officials to come to the US legally? This is disgusting to all legal applicant Immigrants who get lumped into this mess created by exploitive Democrats whom are using this situation as another "CRIS" to feed off of for Democratic Party benefit. question, could the Democrat "insiders" be gainfully getting kickback money from Mexican Cartel Organized Crime Groups taking money off the illegals getting through Mexico? you had numerous Mexican Government Military situations where, Mexican Military Helicopters fired on US Border Control people, and Mexican Ground Troops fired on US Border Patrols. All this - on US Mainland territory. We know that corruption is rampant in Mexico. So, don't you think that just maybe, Eric Holder and others in special places of the White House might be turning a blind eye and doing absolutely nothing just might be secretly profitting off illegals sneaking in under the cover of darkness.
Let's just say the Obama's and the Clinton's keep their mutual hatred of each other behind closed doors. But like all closed doors, even TMZ will find a way to record this vendetta of lust of power. The Clinton's were gutted when upstart Obama got the 2008 nod over Hilliary. But insider progressives had a "wish list" of First-Of's, that meant even as much as they loved having a Hilliary Clinton - First Female US President, to shore up all future elections they had to have Barry Obama First Black President at all cost. So the Clinton's held their collective noses and backed Obama. But don't for a moment misunderstand, Bill Clinton has a lot of political undercover dirt bags whom know a lot about young Barry Obama. There is a file of Barry Obama in the Clinton war chest. Likewise, the Obama Social Activists have a lot of dirt on Hilliary Clinton. So like a Mexican Standoff each holding a gun on each other. Each stepped back and Clinton's stepped back first between the Obama Camp, and the Socialist entities of the Democratic Party each squarely aiming at the Clinton's with massive dirt if Barry doesn't get in with "their" conditions. Barry would vote and do everything that the Social Activists want in return Barry would be the First Black President. Barry would keep his back history hidden, socialists get their Czars, communists put into high places, eco-liberals get their warped EPA rules and worse Green Energy Plans. And " Hope & Change " will destablize the Constitution. Likewise, do nothing Southern Border flooding of illegals permits massive destablization of Texas and many Big Cities turning into cesspools of Democrat Voter Blocks. so two pieces of the Mexican Standoff are in place, and Hilliary will get her nod as next President. Texas will be overrun with Hispanic Illegal Cheats. Big Cities in Texas will become Democrat, Texas will become a Democrat State, and for the next 100 years, it will be impossible for a Republican to become President. Because of a trifecta of three progressive groups behind closed doors agreed in part to permit Barry Obama to become President first, and Hilliary Clinton the heir apparent second. But the outcome of these two will be the destruction of the Constitutution of the United States which excludes any possibility for decades to come a Republican will be sitting in the White House.
In response to:

Dumb & Dumber

Jeff293 Wrote: Jul 05, 2014 4:33 AM
Please drop this "religious" stuff in commenting this decision. You will lose every time against the liberal media and elections. This "Ruling" was about passing the buck onto an Employer for the sexual conduct of its employees. It has nothing to do with disease, or pain, or any such illness that requires medical attention. This decision was about obligating another person in this case a Company to pay for the sexual conduct of its female employees. This leads me to say, at no time or ever has Females been denied their Right to be sexual. But its been the argument by Feminists and liberals to say, that its their right to expect their neigbour to cover the costs of their sexuality. Yes, the Company is owned by devout Christians. We all agree to that. But is it the Company's responsibility to cover the costs in Health Benefits for sexual products? Equally speaking, if liberals demand Companies to pay for Female Birth Inhibiting Products. So could a Company set Female Procreation Limits on its Employees. Let's face it, the cost of females taking extending time off from work to care for a child, and then do so numerous times is a massive cost onto the Employer. Don't Companies have "rights" likewise to define certain expectations of female employees whom might exploit the workplace?
Myself smoke until you drop. But don't get behind the wheel of a vehicle or show up at work influenced by drugs. But there lies the problem with Pot. Pot has zero consistency with product sold to the people who demand access to the commodity. Today's POT is not the 1960-70's Panama Gold. today's Pot is a hybrid of selective pot plant improvements that made the old stuff pale in comparison to the Bud of Today. But the perception of the sale is this benine plant of yesterday but its this HIGH PERFORMANCE growth of massive impact on the user in relation to us the Public dealing with overdrugged misfits. Also, not being told but is the massive Tar release of modern Pot Plant Joints as compared to the same equivalent size and weight of cigarette tobacco products.
No Socialist Democrat sitting in the White House want this woman to open her mouth. With the 2014 Election coming. The last thing the Democrats want now is any testimony by Lerner before any Committee. Especially one that will guarantee, the most dreaded person a Socialist Demcrat wants to see before them, Trey Gowdy. He will be gunning for Lerner and will publicly disembowel her in Committee. So don't expect her to give any testimony now or in the future. She proven to Senior Level White House Administration people. SHE HAS A BIG MOUTH.
Isn't this a lark! John McCain talking about a weaken US position. Pal, YOU ARE THE WEAK POSITION, in dealing with a social activist President and gang of group hug progressives who don't have a clue what the world is about. Liberalism is devoid of contact outside of their dopey world of morons congregating about Ivy League Campuses blowing smoke up each other keesters. None of these putrid little pukes have a clue what the world is outside of their retarded campuses of isolation. John McCain is harming conservatism by selling out conservatives themselves. His wish-washy attitude harms the core strength of collecting Conservatives to fight stupid liberal administration decisions. He opens the door for the liberal MSM to make conservatives look foolish. He just doesn't get it..... Please John, retire. Retire to an Arizona Adult Living Dream Apartment. Grow old with your hubbie. Enjoy your grandkids. But please go away.
Since Common Core has been fronted as the great new educational tool, never has there been a more gross example of stupidity being sold as "New & Improved". Honestly what a bunch of bunk by Educators. How is a student going to be challenged if the material they are being assigned is so grossly flawed. Except of course if the examination is so grossly flawed that each can go hand in hand into NeverNever Land in the form of ridiculous. How can such junk be proof read, and handed out to students is a aboration of dereliction of duty of Teachers. Once a Parent reads this junk being handed out. Even a marginal person can see for themselves that factual necessity to be able to pass is forgone in favour of political opinion. Common Core is a basis of political opinion, and directs miss informed students into left leaning political paths bathed in deliberate facts being vacant. In its place from fact is quasi-impressions of left leaning political opinions. Where is the local School Boards in reading this junk? Why is this material devoid of factual history? Why isn't it vetted before releasing to the public school students. Either be correct, or don't release it to the public. Regardless of political slant. Be correct or be gone. And why are historical events of socialist value given high profile positive spin? Why are hard line leftist --- good, and capitalist self made people left out or denegrated to subhuman levels.
your description of the french Maginot Line pretty well sums up the stupidity of our western Immigration Departments, Canada or United States. Political interference has blunted the enforcement prospects of these departments to be neutered animals incapable of doing their jobs for fear of Senior Management political handlers. The Maginot Line is absolutely correct, because the enemy has already flanked the Line and has end around gone passed the defenses called the Enforcement Officers of the Immigration Department. Heck, they don't even get out of their chairs now because if you report an illegal it could effectlively end your promotions.
So where do you go with this, we are outlawing the use of tobacco smoke but including the use of Pot Smoke. We pemit drugs with cute cultured definitions of wording, like recreational use of drugs. As if sticking the word recreational will improve our lives anymore than recreational use of cocaine would harm us any more. So do we include cocaine as an acceptable form of drug use? Sure, Its "my body and I will do what ever I want with it". Sounds awfully similar to the feminist aborting babies in a recreational sort of way at the good Dr.Gosnell's office. It's my body, and I will do whatever I want with it. It's my right man". Go right ahead people. Release a product with no chemical restrictions in it or guaranteed product standards.
Not to rain on your parade. But why would you legalize a product into the whole population when there is no available test to determine if the user of this product is legal within a framework of acceptability to be operating equipment common to the population with which we all share. It's bad enough we have drunk drivers, but why would you release millions of incoherent fools totally enebriated by the use of Pot! Do you even have a " Road Side Test " that can be used by our Police Services like a Breathalyzer which can immediately test the Consumer as Drugged or Safe to the Public. As far as I know there is no Road Side Test currently available for criminal determination of suspect. There are Blood Tests, but they take time.
1 - 10 Next