In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Jeff2422 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 12:50 PM
we were told that a new ice age was coming. Look, core samples from Antartica show that the middle ages were warming on average then now. It simply is impossible to extrapolate any long term conclusions from the sample. Second, Mount St. Helens spewed more carbon into the air than a 100 years of industrial emmissions in the US. Even assuming there is warming, again, there is no way to know if it is natural or due to human behavior. There are other factors as volcanoes and the cycles of the sun that are never talked about or taken into consideration let alone the history of the planet. Finally, even if the entire theory is true and man can affect the global climate, then why should the US wreck its economy while China and India belch (cont)

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows.

If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek.