In response to:

President Obama's Symbiotic Relationship With the Abortion Industry

Jeff2422 Wrote: Apr 23, 2013 4:14 PM
Science has dictated the standard lib response. In the days of Roe v. Wade, there was no sonogram to show brain activity and differentation as early as 8 weeks. People can see that the unborn child is just that a growing child who happens to be in a biological incubator. At some point, science will provide a mechanical incubator (I will invest in that and will make a mint), as Justice O'Connor often postulated, then what? Libs know this and are preparing to argue that a woman has the absolute right to choose, despite science and viability. So they say safe, legal, and rare because science is not on their side in the long run.
When I read that President Obama refused to comment on the murder trial of abortion butcher Kermit Gosnell "because it's an active trial," I knew immediately he wasn't being truthful.

In fact, the second I heard about Obama's excuse for dodging the question, I tweeted that ongoing investigations or trials did not preclude his publicly weighing in on the Trayvon Martin case or on the case of his friend and Harvard professor Henry Gates, about which he said the Cambridge police had acted "stupidly."

If there ever has been a case of tainting the jury pool, Obama's public identification with Martin was it....