In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

jeanhart Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:10 PM
Lois - attacks while bush was in office: Karachi, Pakiston 2002 Uzbekistan 2004 Saudi Arabia 20042008 Syria 2006 Athens 2007 Serbia 2008 Yemen 2008
wordsPerMinute Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:36 PM
but being despised by the enemy is a good thing; Oh and you forgot US 9/11
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:16 PM
Were all these the result of a video, too, jeanie?
Buck O Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:15 PM
So what? Did we have prior indications these were going to happen as we did in Benghazi?
TaxFree1031 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:13 PM
What difference does it make?
Loiso12013 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:12 PM
yep; apparently Republicans don't have to answer for those deaths.
The Republicans could give a toss about dead Americans - they like wars where Americans (not their kids) get killed so their rich and big business buddies can sell cheap garbage to the military. The only reason these hearings are going on is because the Republicans think they can get political mileage from them. What happened - happened. Measures have been taken to make sure it doesn't happen again. Who knew what when, who did what, or who did or didn't read one of the thousands of dispatches that hit the State Department every day doesn't mean anything at this point.
DSMike Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:18 PM
Do you have an answer for Clinton's?
aj59 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:20 PM
How hard do work to be this STUPID????? Not very, as all your posts are nothing more than DEBUNKED democrat talking points. Must really s*ck to be you.......but then again you prove the stupid democrat sterotype with every post.
smokindave Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:20 PM
Just curious-what measures? And are you accusing all Repubs of profiting from War? Much the same way the Dems who own stock in gun companies have profited the past several years? I'm not ripping the Dems-buy stock in any company you want. I'm wondering why when the Left does it it's OK, but when the right does it it's evil.
JamesB2 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:29 PM
Aww, someone has a crush on Hillary. Does Huma know?
Ronald484 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:38 PM
And the Democrats are just intent to cover everything up, to just sweep it all under the rug.
DSMike Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 1:12 PM
Can you name the Clinton attacks? Hypocrisy much?

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:

 

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...