Previous 21 - 30 Next
Ann, I appreciated your article until I got to the part about homosexuals... . I know homosexuals. What they do is immoral. They may do other things that are good, but none of those good things somehow make the immoral things good by virtue that they happen to be embodied in the same person.
Why doesn't Obama give them his paycheck seeing as how he's made millions off of his books (which were marketed off his presidency).
lol -10% is nothing compared to four years of unemployment and unsteady employment due to his stupid economic policies and lack of dedication to freeing up the private sector. I and my family suffered because of him.
In response to:

Going over the Moral Cliff

jdelligatti Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 12:50 PM
It's not so much that mankind has invented more ways to be immoral (which it has), but it's that a greater percentage of mankind engages in immorality. Additionally, never has persecution against moral-living people been so widespread and commonplace.
In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

jdelligatti Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 2:12 PM
Blogan30, Romney was NOT the problem. And you "hard workers" must have forgotten about us fresh-out-of-school, unemployed or under-employed people who love the Constitution, free enterprise, and opportunity. We understand the issues, and know that Romney IS the solution. I started as a Pawlenty supporter until he ducked out and threw his support behind Mitt Romney. It caused me to take another look at Mr. Romney. The more I researched him, the more I knew that he was the best presidential candidate our country has seen in our lifetime. And yes, he's better than Reagan. Reagan was good because he had good morals and trusted the experts. Mitt not only has good morals, but has the ability to keep up with those advising experts.
In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

jdelligatti Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 2:03 PM
It's called "hope". Because what else is there to do but try even harder and do even more and become even more politically active to try to stop it. It went from "We can avoid the problem" to "We can deal with this problem if we all work together".
In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

jdelligatti Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 1:59 PM
And let's not forget all of the Ron Paulers (both independent and liberal conservatives") who projected all of their extreme idealism and wild fantasies onto a single candidate. When I say "extreme idealism", I don't mean that the ideals are bad - just unaccomplish-able for a single president in one term (or even in two). But take the extremist Marxist (Obama) who thought he'd fundamentally change the government when he became president. He couldn't do it one term - nor will he get it in two (hopefully). People forget that the Constitution, which they're so eager to tell others to read, purposefully divides the power in government among the Executive branch, Congress, and the Courts. These people quit trying when Ron Paul failed.
In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

jdelligatti Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 1:36 PM
I like Ann. She's what happens when you combine the best elements of beauty, wicked smarts, and American values. I would also add that Romney lost because... 1. Voter fraud (liberal grassroots supporters, illegal voter registrations, the voting machines, and the people in charge of voting in some states like Florida) 2. Free stuff and perks to special interest groups via power-abusing presidential executive orders 3. Bitter and unintelligent primary-loser supporters who never reconciled their differences 4. Too many (3 million apparently) Republicans who only watched MSNBC and Obama's remarks 5. Some anti-Mormons missed the bumper sticker that said, "I'll take the Mormon over the moron." And let's not forget the idiots.
Mitt may never lived in poverty, but he did live as humbly as most. He lived in small apartments when he was first married and during his first baby, and had his down days in the early years of his career. But he learned, and progressed, and worked hard. Building his reputation helped him to be successful.
In response to:

Is There Anyone Obama Won't Betray?

jdelligatti Wrote: Aug 20, 2012 3:20 PM
In opposition to this, George W Bush got it right. Saddam Hussein was the icon of his terrorist state. When the time was right, Saddam Hussein was captured, and turned over to his own people to be tried by his own people for his crimes. He was convicted by his own new government, and was sentenced to a public hanging by his own people. His death marked the end of Iraq's threat against his people and against the free world.
In response to:

Is There Anyone Obama Won't Betray?

jdelligatti Wrote: Aug 20, 2012 3:19 PM
We knew the exact location of Osama Bin Laden for about a year, and had surveillance set up around his hideout officially for over seven months. Osama had a failing kidney and required regular dialysis and was on his death bed. Osama wasn't really a threat personally - it was the Al Qaida movement that was the threat. Obama's ratings had just began a free fall due to the unpopularity of the recent Obama-Care. Obama had the icon of the still-active Al Qaida movement martyred on his deathbed, and then had the evidence/body dumped into the ocean - Chicago style. Obama's ratings recovered (back up to a near 50% overall approval rating). Osama's death showed the world slimy politics: Barack Obama's sacrifice to the voting Gods.
Previous 21 - 30 Next