We can all thank George W. Bush and the Republican Party for the cram down on ethanol mandates. Inhale deeply my friends and take a look at the link below. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2830772120070301 SIX BILLION DOLLARS EVERY YEAR.

We can all thank George W. Bush and the Republican Party for the cram down on ethanol mandates. Inhale deeply my friends and take a look at the link below. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2830772120070301 SIX BILLION DOLLARS EVERY YEAR.

The 2008 Republican presidential candidate John McCain proposed a $300 billion mortgage relief program. Isn't this yet another Republican Marxian wealth redistribution program that was four times LARGER than Obama's $75 billion program? Read about the Republican Marxist program here; http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4932E920081008 Let's be frank, John McCain's mortgage relief program was another Republican-Marxist wealth redistribution plan that planned to redistribute wealth from those who could afford their house to those who bought more house than they can afford. And by extension, all those who voted for him are Marxists or to say they at least have Marxian tendencies. Are we clear?

Can we talk about Republican wealth redistribution? This link shows that George W. Bush and his Republican administration gave AIG at least $150 billion. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE52624P20090308 Below is an excerpt from the article for those reading here. "The U.S. government first rode to AIG's rescue in September of 2008 with an $85 billion credit line after losses from toxic investments, many of which were mortgage related, and collateral demands from banks, left AIG staring down bankruptcy. Later in 2008, the rescue packaged was increased to $150 billion. The bailout was overhauled by the Republican administration, once again, to offer the insurer an additional $30 billion in equity."

Can we talk about Republican wealth redistribution? This link shows that George W. Bush and his Republican administration gave AIG at least $150 billion. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE52624P20090308 Below is an excerpt from the article for those reading here. "The U.S. government first rode to AIG's rescue in September of 2008 with an $85 billion credit line after losses from toxic investments, many of which were mortgage related, and collateral demands from banks, left AIG staring down bankruptcy. Later in 2008, the rescue packaged was increased to $150 billion. The bailout was overhauled by the Republican administration, once again, to offer the insurer an additional $30 billion in equity."

Let's talk about insurance and the AIG Republican sponsored teat suck. "Bush defends Fed's decision to bail out AIG" http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/18/wallstreet.georgebush "The AIG rescue was the fourth taxpayer-funded bailout of the year by the Bush administration, although at odds with Bush's free-market ideology and economic policies. Critics of the recent bailouts have said taxpayers should not foot the bill for investors' bad business decisions." Republicans say their bailouts are for the good of the country. Who gets to decide what is good for the country? Joseph Stalin started the collective farm system in the USSR in the early 1930's because he said it was for the 'good of the country.'

Let's talk about insurance and the AIG Republican sponsored teat suck. "Bush defends Fed's decision to bail out AIG" http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/18/wallstreet.georgebush "The AIG rescue was the fourth taxpayer-funded bailout of the year by the Bush administration, although at odds with Bush's free-market ideology and economic policies. Critics of the recent bailouts have said taxpayers should not foot the bill for investors' bad business decisions." Republicans say their bailouts are for the good of the country. Who gets to decide what is good for the country? Joseph Stalin started the collective farm system in the USSR in the early 1930's because he said it was for the 'good of the country.'

yep