In response to:

Let’s Have That Conversation About Guns

jco2012 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 10:48 PM
The usual simplistic drivel. Yes, by all means let's have more guns lying around, where the emotionally unstable can get a hold of them.
Corlyss Wrote: Dec 18, 2012 5:37 AM
I have a better idea. Why don't we lock up the mentally ill like we used to before the ACLU started messing around with those laws? Why do you think disarming the law-abiding will solve the issue of mass murders? I can tell you: it won't. But once the guns are taken away, there will be no going back. There will be just more mass murders by people who have guns illegally. The simplistic drivel is all on the gun-control side.
Diogenese_wy Wrote: Dec 18, 2012 12:31 AM
Recent incidents not being shouted out by the lame stream press:
China; Distraught lover wounds 22 kids in school with a KNIFE.
Wyoming; Deranged son kills father and father's girlfriend with a CROSSBOW and a KNIFE.
Florida; Trailer park tenant kills neighbor with a HAMMER.
Also; Distraught wife runs over husband with a MERCEDES.
Maybe we should have fewer emotionally unstable people on the loose?
BK22 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 10:56 PM
Uhmmmm well then I guess you are also in favor of eliminating autos since THEY kill more people than anyone of anything.

For once I agree with liberals. It’s high time to have a conversation about guns. Let’s start with the problem that there are far too few guns on our streets.

Wait, we can’t have that conversation. In fact, we’re not supposed to have what people might commonly describe as a “conversation” at all. We’re supposed to shut-up and listen as liberals, barely masking their unseemly delight at the opportunity, try to pin the murder rampage of one degenerate creep on millions of law-abiding Americans who did nothing wrong. The conversation is then supposed to end with us waiving our fundamental right...