Previous -3 - 2
No Catholics I know will be voting for obama and socialist crony's including Progressive Hillary Clinton
People who use the term ‘social’ are usually socialist or progressive; a slight difference in being communistic. This is also part of the problem with the United Nations, it is based in such manner that it highly approves communistic states. It violates our Constitution to be involved in such a fictitious organization as the U.N., let alone the U.N.
In response to:

What's Behind Hatred of Obama?

jcampbell903 Wrote: Aug 04, 2012 4:35 PM
A Democratic Poster Said We are almost done taking control of every part of government and business so that everyone must agree to do what we think is best for everyone else. People like You just need to be re-educated to understand that Socialist policies are for their own good, and for the good of the rest of the world. In October 2009, The Democratic Socialists of America released in its newsletter a list of 70 members of the U.S. Congress who are members of the organization
In response to:

Suppose Michele Bachmann Is Right?

jcampbell903 Wrote: Jul 26, 2012 5:09 PM
Love is blind Willis
In response to:

Suppose Michele Bachmann Is Right?

jcampbell903 Wrote: Jul 26, 2012 5:04 PM
Huma Abedin was affiliated with the IMMA from as far back as 1996 until late 2008, after which she joined the State Department. She is no longer listed, but a screenshot of the IMMA journal’s website, captured in 2008, identifies her as an assistant editor. The IMMA was started in Saudi Arabia in the Seventies by Huma Abedin’s parents, with the backing of Abdullah Omar Naseef. Naseef is a former secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology. Senator McCain is hopeless. But perhaps Speaker Boehner and Chairman Rogers could find a way to attack the Muslim Brotherhood rather than their conservative colleagues.
In response to:

Conservatives and the Court

jcampbell903 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 9:48 PM
There is no act taken by the Obama administration, no matter how tyrannical, which elicits reaction of any kind. There is no loss of rights inflicted upon Americans that will cause Democrats to speak up against Americans no longer have any rights which their government need respect. The onslaught against civil liberties and human rights has been perfected under the Obama regime with the complete and unqualified support of the congressional Democratic majority.
Previous -3 - 2