In response to:

Rupert Murdoch vs Mitt Romney

jburkiewicz Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 10:01 AM
However, if Ron Paul pulls it off and wins the Republican nomination, he will get all the Republican vote, most of the Independent vote, and a whole lot of people who voted for Obama last time because Obama promised to end the wars. So to sum up, if Romney is the nominee, you are looking at 4 more years of Obama. If Ron Paul is the nominee, you are looking at President Paul. Please educate yourself via the internet. You can't count on the boob-tube for accurate information. Mainstream media is owned by huge corporations that are owned by still larger corporations that have a vested interest in maintaing the status quo and keeping their politicians bought and paid for.
amy185 Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 6:42 PM
I wish it could be as you predict, but if we could unite behind Romney, we could feasibly get Monster Obama out. Wouldn't Ron Paul be great in Romney's office doing what he does best. Since the likelihood of getting Ron Paul as president is low to nil, let's get behind Romney and then work to have Paul part of his cabinet.
Milt37 Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 2:02 PM
jurk,

If you're still looking for Ron Paul for President, your head is firmly planted in your behind.

Fox News and Wall Street Journal mogul Rupert Murdoch has gone public with his dislike of Mitt Romney. Murdoch tweeted on July 1, “Met Romney last week. Tough O Chicago pros will be hard to beat unless he drops old friends from team and hires some real pros. Doubtful.” Murdoch is displeased that Romney has retained some of the same campaign advisers from his 2008 run for president. Last week, Murdoch tweeted about Romney, "Seems to play everything safe, make no news except burn off Hispanics."

When asked if he had contributed to Romney's campaign, Murdoch replied, “None!” Generally...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Rupert Murdoch