In response to:

Jensen and Flynn

jbriggs Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 12:44 PM
The greatest looming problem is that Mother Nature turns out around 65% of the population who are designed to be proles, but automation has made proles obsolete.
phillip116 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 11:34 AM
And all of which prompts the reflection that, with reference first, to populations of color, but to the larger population as well, probably, IQ by itself, or "how well" someone does has most to do with connections with parents in general, but most with connections with the father—and sofar as, "doing well" intellectually, is perhaps the largest thing which the mother depends on the father to fulfill, . . .

But to return to the primary thrust of "jbriggs' " original comment, I am concerned that, the nation is soon to face a war, undergoing invasion, and one in which people of color are set up to be eliminated.

And just a few items: and, I don't recall just where I ran across this but, one Chinese General or military man told one of

Anyone who has followed the decades-long controversies over the role of genes in IQ scores will recognize the names of the two leading advocates of opposite conclusions on that subject-- Professor Arthur R. Jensen of the University of California at Berkeley and Professor James R. Flynn, an American expatriate at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

What is so unusual in the academic world of today is that Professor Flynn's latest book, "Are We Getting Smarter?" is dedicated to Arthur Jensen, whose integrity he praises, even as he opposes his conclusions. That is what scholarship and science are...

Related Tags: Intelligence