In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

jblowthemidget Wrote: Dec 23, 2012 2:29 PM
I am stunned how fast the memory of 87 young people killed with a gallon of gasoline in 1990 in the Bronx has faded from discussion. The drunken loser's motive was a fight with his former girlfriend and his solution was to torch the club where she worked. Maybe we need to ban "assault gas cans"?
Mike355 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 9:00 AM
No, we just need to ban Liberal Progressives in Congress. They is where all of our problem lies with. They are the ban happy people who we are supposed to bow down to and kiss their a**es because they want to pass a ban. I think the first things that should be banned is Lawyers serving in any capacity in Congress, or the White House. Secondly, we should ban Lawmakers from passing any bans or prohibiting anything, because anything that is banned or prohibited will automatically have a Black Market created for those items banned.

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...