1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:14 PM
Clueless. Check out Hitler's bio along side Obama's. Nearly identical.
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:12 PM
So? What does this have to do with Coulter's column?
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:10 PM
According to who? You? Such generalizations. Worthless.
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:08 PM
The "sclerotic heart" of Washington does need jolting. I think you don't know a thing about the Tea Party. What proof??
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:06 PM
Obama has made it an issue by attacking "social" issues. He is smart to address this.
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:03 PM
Why? How is that at all related to what Coulter has written?
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 12:02 PM
The Problem is Coulter She claims Santorum is helping the Democrats but she is the one doing their job. "We're conservatives! We believe the states can establish a religion--and the federal government can't. " NO GOVERNMENT IN THIS COUNTRY CAN ESTABLISH A RELIGION. She also writes "the issues closest to his heart are family-oriented matters about which the federal government can, and should, do very little." The problem is that the federal government IS encroaching on issues that it has NO business messing with. So it IS an issue. Religious liberty & freedom of speech are just "family-oriented matters"? Are attacks on the first amendment just minor irritations that have no effect on we the people? Ann picks at style not content. No No No
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Jbbnntt Wrote: Mar 01, 2012 11:16 AM
Relevance?
In response to:

The President's 'Social Gospel'

Jbbnntt Wrote: Feb 07, 2012 11:39 AM
I agree entirely!
In response to:

The President's 'Social Gospel'

Jbbnntt Wrote: Feb 07, 2012 11:38 AM
You are the master of unprovable generalities. You too are nit picking or can't you see that? Where does the Constitution say that it can be changed at will without official Congressional input? (and the oversight and agreement from each branch of government)? What have Conservatives (according to your definition of course) wanted to add or subtract from the Constitution? Chapter and verse please.
1 - 10 Next