In response to:

Could Ronald Reagan Get Elected Today?

jbaddy Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 3:14 PM
So, tell me, what's the difference between eleven million people voting once for a president, and five million people voting once with three million people voting twice for a president, or any combination thereof? It's the difference between a dictatorship and a democracy. Congratulations Mr. President, you just became the Bashir Assad of the U.S. Barack Obama Is the dictator of the Syrian States of America. After That election? Nobody can claim that the US. is a democracy, anymore.
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:16 PM
We live in a Republic. Go away America hater!
Origanalist Again Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 3:23 PM
We aren't supposed to be a democracy.
RINO Detector Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 4:29 PM
At a certain level though we are supposed to have democratic processes. I agree. F this nation. It continues sinking into a very real abyss. My only remaining concern is for the kids growing up in this fascist, pathetic "republic."
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:17 PM
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:17 PM
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:17 PM
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:17 PM

Popular theory suggests Reagan was too moderate for today’s GOP, but the experts disagree.


From Townhall Magazine's November Perspectives by Kyle Bonnell:

Questioning Ronald Reagan’s electability in today’s political environment has become a preoccupation of today’s liberals. As this story goes, Ronald Reagan was too moderate and compromising for the tea party-infested, intransigent and ideologically rigid Republican Party. But is it true?

Not according to Edwin Meese, President Reagan’s Attorney General.

“If you look at his...

Related Tags: Tea Party Ronald Reagan