1 - 10 Next
How? Please be specific.
They are like a broken watch. Right occasionally...
One example - infant baptism. In the New Testament we read that Lydia was converted by Paul’s preaching and that "She was baptized, with her household" (Acts 16:15). The Philippian jailer whom Paul and Silas had converted to the faith was baptized that night along with his household. We are told that "the same hour of the night . . . he was baptized, with all his family" (Acts 16:33). And in his greetings to the Corinthians, Paul recalled that, "I did baptize also the household of Stephanas" (1 Cor. 1:16). In all these cases, whole households or families were baptized.
Douglas54 Wrote:1 hour ago (9:53 AM) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Sigh. Douglas, please study the history of the early church. The things you mention are 'inventions' of protestants from the last 100-500 years. The Catholic Church (along with Orthodox) can trace their doctrine back to apostolic times. Can your church?
mjohansen Wrote:14 mins ago (11:03 AM) Hmm. If I was a Catholic, I'm not sure that I'd be boasting that my church had substituted human wisdom for the plain teaching of the Bible, not just now, but for 60-plus years =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Which bible? The one that was considered as Sacred Scripture for over 1100 years until Luther removed books that didn't fit his personal theology.
As Pius XII (who many sedevacationists consider the last 'true' Pope) said the same thing as Francis does that also make him a heretic?
willi4 Wrote:2 hours ago (8:25 AM) The RCC went off the rails in the 1960's. Vatican II is heresy. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Are you a sedevacationist? Please explain specifically how VII is heresy.
In response to:

Embarrassing Economists

jazzmanJim Wrote: Oct 22, 2014 12:09 PM
The state or local municipality would require a licence as you are running a business. You'd then have to declare your income, pay taxes, insurance...
In response to:

Embarrassing Economists

jazzmanJim Wrote: Oct 22, 2014 12:07 PM
Zenarts Wrote:1 hour ago (10:37 AM) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= So much wrong here. As a start - define the term 'living wage'. Why did you chose this number? Why not $50/hr? (I could sure live quite well on that).
In response to:

The Price of Papal Popularity

jazzmanJim Wrote: Oct 21, 2014 4:56 PM
CMRI are schismatics
1 - 10 Next