In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

Jay Wye Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:42 AM
Homos already HAVE -equal- right to marriage; they can marry another person of the opposite sex the same as any other person. That IS the definition of "marriage";man-woman,it's been that way for several thousand years. This is all about the REDEFINITION of "marriage" to be something it's never been,and thus FORCING other states to recognize the abomination via Article IV,sec 1. Homos are seeking SPECIAL rights and the reordering of US society to suit their agenda and mental illness.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...